Commas strike me as dangerous... occur too much in phrases that might
properly be atomic?
In fact, I was sort of expecting someone to make the same assertion
about semicolons.
On Monday, December 01, 1997 2:56 PM, Jordan Reiter
[SMTP:[log in to unmask]] wrote:
> tf
> Weibel,Stu felt an urge to reveal at 11:50 AM -0000 on 12/1/97:
> > As for Key words, I am very much in the camp of aggregating key
words in
> > a single content field, delimited as appropriate with semicolons.
I'm
> > not sure we've agreed upon the semicolons as the best delimiter, and
in
> > fact this might be a good time
> > to address this issue. Keywords are indexing access points, and
phrases
> > are certainly within scope... is there an accepted phrase delimiter
we
> > can borrow from the indexing and abstracting world to propose as the
> > standard?
>
> Commas seem widely used. I see no real reason why they can't be used
here.
> Again, I think that standardizing delimiters should mean that search
> engines, if they are indexing a conforming document, should store
these
> items as unified wholes. In other words, If I have something like:
>
> <META NAME="Keywords" CONTENT="1996 Political
Contributions,blah,blah">
>
> That a search for "1996 Political Contributions" would pick up *my*
page
> before someone with this kind of usage:
>
> <META NAME="Keywords" CONTENT="Baseball cards from 1996, Politicial
Jokes,
> Readers' Contributions">
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> [ Jordan Reiter ]
> [ mailto:[log in to unmask] ]
> [ "It's well known that dead people are all sick ]
> [ because they're too depressing." ]
> [ -- from http://www.icemcfd.com/cgi-bin/make_flame ]
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
|