At 11:57 PM 10/4/2005, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
>Tom ... Please read www.w3.org/wai/pf/roadmap. ...
Thanks, that is an excellent document. But I was trying to make the point
that many people will not get to read such documents, if you use such
cryptic announcements. You need to clearly say what it is you are
suggesting be read and why.
An announcement should, I suggest, include the name of the document, a
paragraph from the document (to explain what it is for) and the URL of the
document. If I receive a message headed "Please read" with part of a URL
(as you supplied), I would normally assume it is some sort of scam and
delete it without reading further or clicking on any links.
But this is probably not the place to have a discussion of what the W3C
should put in its announcements. I have written to the W3C HQ proposing
they issue a recommended format for announcements.
Tom Worthington FACS HLM [log in to unmask] Ph: 0419 496150
Director, Tomw Communications Pty Ltd ABN: 17 088 714 309
PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617 http://www.tomw.net.au/
Director, ACS Communications Tech Board http://www.acs.org.au/ctb/
Visiting Fellow, ANU Blog: http://www.tomw.net.au/blog/atom.xml
|