I think I applied 2.8.4.5 for multiple publishers but also based it on the
presentation of the example in 2.8.4.4.
Celine
On Oct 24 2012, Freedman, Vanessa wrote:
>Hi Celine
>
>I can't see this in RDA 2.8.4. Am I missing something?
>
>Thanks
>
>Vanessa
>
>Vanessa Freedman
>Hebrew & Jewish Studies Librarian
>UCL Library Services
>University College London
>Gower Street
>London WC1E 6BT
>
>Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 2598 (Internal ext. 32598)
>Fax: +44 (0) 20 7679 7373
>E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>Website: www.ucl.ac.uk/library
>
>**Please remember the environment and only print this if necessary**
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: CIG E-Forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of C.J. Carty Sent: 24
> October 2012 11:47 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re:
> [CIG-E-FORUM] DISCUSSION record 3
>
>On Oct 24 2012, Nicky Ransom wrote:
>
>> I suppose National Archives has a relationship to the manifestation,
>> rather than the work, and then the only option in the RDA Appendix is
>> "Broadcaster", which clearly isn't right! I probably wouldn't give
>> them an entry as they are part of the publication statement and Facet
>> don't get an added entry, but I'm happy to be corrected!
>
> I went and checked rules because I wanted to justify my transcription of
> National Archives in the publisher statement too. I'm including it in
> publisher based on 2.8.4, though this is optional and it's only core RDA
> to have the first named publisher.
>
> As regards the access point, I think that there's a rule for including
> publisher as corporate body with relationhip to the manifestation in 21.3
> that I feel justifies giving an access point. However, I completely agree
> that the only relationship designator listed for this in the Appendix is
> "broadcaster" which definitely doesn't work.
>
>Celine
>
--
Céline Carty
English Cataloguing
Cambridge University Library
Cambridge CB3 9DR
|