Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: C.J. Carty [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of C.J. Carty
Sent: 24 October 2012 15:19
To: Williams,HK
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 1 discussion
On Oct 24 2012, Helen Williams wrote:
[...]
>Something, perhaps more basic, that I wasn't sure about was 2.15.1.7
>about qualification of ISBNs - it says for updating loose-leafs add the
>qualification (loose-leaf) to the identifier. Is that only in
>instances where the resource bears 'more than one identifier of the
>same type' as at the beginning of the instruction. Or is loose-leaf in
>a category on its own?!
I'm seeing this as an exceptional case where the qualifier is added even
if only one identifier is in the record (though think I omitted it in my
own
record...)
Celine
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
|