Dear Markus,
They should both work. Setting up the spectra might be slightly smoother
from Bruker - e.g. experiment types are handled more automatically
there. Of course if ucsf proves better in day-to-day work, as Marie Phelan
says, that would be more important.
BTW, out new FormatExchange program can read in entire Sparky projects
more smoothly than FormatConverter used to do. It is barely released now,
but owrth trying if you have old projects to load.
All the best,
Rasmus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Rasmus H. Fogh Email: [log in to unmask]
Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge,
80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. FAX (01223)766002
On Mon, 28 May 2012, Markus Heller wrote:
> Hello all,
> Sparky user here, but I have decided to give CcpNmr Analysis a try for my
> next assignment project, since I'm pretty impressed with its
> capabilities.
>
> What file format for the NMR data would you recommend and why? My top
> two options are Bruker's 3rrr and sparky's ucsf. I've pretty much never
> used nmrpipe, which eliminates a bunch of options.
>
> So, if you had to decided between 3rrr and ucsf, what would you pick and
> why?
>
> Thanks and Cheers
> Markus
>
>
|