JISCMail - EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

January 1999

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
RE: JAMA issue	Dr Johan Kock	Sat, 4 Jan 1997 00:43:48 +0200	125 lines
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!	Dr Johan Kock	Tue, 7 Jan 1997 09:12:59 +0200	70 lines
Journal of Informatics in Primary Care	Sheila Teasdale.	Sat, 2 Jan 1999 22:07:07 -0000	42 lines
Head Lice	0tolerance	Sat, 02 Jan 1999 18:26:26 -0800	28 lines
Re: two questions	Peggy Hines	Sun, 3 Jan 1999 06:48:18 -0800 (PST)	82 lines
	<>	04 Jan 1999 10:06:52 +0000	9 lines
re: Head Lice	Peter English	Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:52:04 +0000	20 lines
SHIMR 99 - Call for Papers	Ian Bowns	Mon, 4 Jan 1999 15:45:09 +0000	188 lines
Re: Head Lice	Peg Allen	Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:21:04 -0600	53 lines
Re: Negative Results.	Balvinder Kaur	Tue, 5 Jan 1999 09:54:26 GMT	58 lines
RE: Teaching EBM in real time: treatment UTI	N.P. van Duijn	Tue, 5 Jan 1999 11:29:09 +0100	44 lines
Reviewers Sought for Positron Emission Tomography Report Update	Elaine C Alligood	Tue, 5 Jan 1999 07:16:52 -0500 (EST)	52 lines
clinical relevance and presentation of differences ordinal scale	N.P. van Duijn	Tue, 5 Jan 1999 15:12:36 +0100	53 lines
Re: RE: RE: Bibliographic software	Adrian Midgley	Tue, 5 Jan 1999 14:54:01 -0000	24 lines
	<>	Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:40:44 +0000	13 lines
New link for best evidence	[log in to unmask]	Wed, 06 Jan 1999 15:25:08 +1100	46 lines
(Fwd) TISS, MODS	Peter Dodek	Fri, 8 Jan 1999 08:56:05 +0000	44 lines
antibiotic treatment short courses UTI	N.P. van Duijn	Fri, 8 Jan 1999 11:59:55 +0100	56 lines
MS and Beta interferon enquiry	John Bryant	Fri, 08 Jan 1999 11:58:34 +0000	29 lines
Registries for cardiac services	<>	08 Jan 1999 14:24:37 +0000	23 lines
'Seprafilm' bioreabsorbable membrane	Sumeyah Sallam	Fri, 8 Jan 1999 10:13:30 -0800 (PST)	36 lines
The WWW and patient recuitment for RCTs	Dr. Samuel Wiebe	Fri, 8 Jan 1999 13:50:57 -0500 (EST)	58 lines
RE: The WWW and patient recuitment for RCTs	Carol Lefebvre	Fri, 8 Jan 1999 19:16:33 -0000	83 lines
Re: Registries for cardiac services	Adrian Midgley	Fri, 8 Jan 1999 22:04:21 -0000	32 lines
MS and Beta interferon enquiry	padmanabhan badrinath	Fri, 08 Jan 1999 20:27:32 PST	47 lines
RE: Registries for cardiac services	Chris Burton	Sat, 9 Jan 1999 14:47:58 -0000	93 lines
Re: RE: Registries for cardiac services	Adrian Midgley	Sat, 9 Jan 1999 19:31:29 -0000	75 lines
New discussion list epi_shift	Dr. Harshad Thakur	Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:07:39 +0530	44 lines
Negative Results.	Arturo Marti-Carvajal	Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:11:26 -0400	31 lines
Radical Statistics TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE (fwd)	Alison Macfarlane	Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:32:09 +0000 (GMT)	189 lines
Quantitative Research-short courses	Karen Pilkington	Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:27:00 +0000	21 lines
Re: two questions	Paul Krueger	Mon, 11 Jan 1999 08:29:34 -0500 (EST)	42 lines
FW: Delivery failure!	<>	Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:23:57 +0000	59 lines
Guidelines to help report studies evaluating health prom	Martin White	Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:47:26 GMT0BST	68 lines
Bibliographic software and the EBH mailbase	Richard Hancock	Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:01:40 +0000	17 lines
RE: Negative Results.	Simon, Steve, PhD	Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:23:59 -0600	87 lines
Organisational culture and EBM	Dr Trisha Greenhalgh	Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:36:02 -0800	52 lines
Re: Negative Results.	N.P. van Duijn	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:23:40 +0100	62 lines
osteoporosis bulletin	Sophia Bird	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:39:34 +0000	32 lines
Workshops in software for qualitative analysis - NUDIST and ATLAS.ti	SDG Associates	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:01:08 -0000	45 lines
Re: The WWW and patient recuitment for RCTs	Ben Toth	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:47:27 -0000	96 lines
Re: Negative Results.	Fujian Song	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 12:07:36 +0000	72 lines
Teniae	Michele Panunzio	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:29:11 +0100	50 lines
anthelmintic drugs	Michele Panunzio	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:34:41 +0100	48 lines
Negative results in observational studies	padmanabhan badrinath	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 20:25:38 PST	84 lines
Re: Negative results in observational studies	Arturo Marti-Carvajal	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 06:10:36 -0400	100 lines
Re: Negative results in observational studies	Fujian Song	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:27:24 +0000	129 lines
EVIDENCE BASED MANAGEMENT	<>	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:54:47 +0000	43 lines
epid_shift: New subscription address	Dr. Harshad Thakur	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:09:31 +0530	45 lines
Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia	Katherine Schneider, MD	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:38:58 -0500 (EST)	48 lines
Re: 'Seprafilm' bioreabsorbable membrane	Deborah Chase	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:27:15 -0500 (EST)	73 lines
EBM	<>	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:16:50 +1100	25 lines
Re: EBM	Dave Sackett	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:18:24 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	46 lines
Lecturer post in Social Science and Medicine (clinical or non-clinical)	Dr Adrian Renton (Social Science and Medicine)	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 12:35:07 +0000	62 lines
RE: EBM	Henry Barry	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:37:33 -0500	62 lines
Re: Negative Results.	Dave Sackett	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:00:04 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	47 lines
Re: Negative Results.	Peter Griffiths	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:59:41 +0000	37 lines
RE: Negative Results for meta-analysis	Montori, Victor M., M.D.	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 11:29:38 -0600	70 lines
Re EBH	Rowena Clayton	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:32:24 +0000	22 lines
negative results	John Stapleton	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:33:46 +0000	64 lines
Re: Negative Results for meta-analysis	Peter Griffiths	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:08:36 +0000	50 lines
Re: Negative Results.	Richard Morris	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:15:57 +0000	56 lines
TV news and EBM	Amit Ghosh	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 12:31:16 -0600	39 lines
Re: TV news and EBM	Susan Kaiser, M.D.	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:50:40 -0500	90 lines
RE: negative results	Simon, Steve, PhD	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:35:24 -0600	72 lines
who wants articles against EBM?	Dr Trisha Greenhalgh	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:18:23 -0800	41 lines
Re: TV news and EBM	Gaetano Lombardo, PT	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:57:40 -0500	68 lines
adjusting for statification	Sean Keenan	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:52:16 PST	47 lines
Re: TV news and EBM and brain tumors missed	N.P. van Duijn	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 08:29:07 +0100	131 lines
Where is Sam Wiebe? (about presenting ordinal scales)	N.P. van Duijn	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 08:38:19 +0100	26 lines
RE: TV news and EBM	S.Mola	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:37:31 +0100	43 lines
Re: negative results	Peter Griffiths	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:05:33 +0000	55 lines
Re: Negative Results.	Dr. Paul Kamill	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:36:59 -0000	92 lines
"Hospital Without Walls" Conference - 24 - 26 March 1999	<>	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:48:22 -0000	1147 lines
Re: Negative Results.	Kath McPherson	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:52:12 +1300	39 lines
Short Course: Survey Data Analysis II 27-29 January 99	Nyovani Madise	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:16:43 GMT	105 lines
RE: negative results	jenny keating	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 23:30:32 +1100	69 lines
Re: negative results	Peter Griffiths	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:52:23 +0000	47 lines
RE: negative results	N.P. van Duijn	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:16:43 +0100	75 lines
Health Statistics Users Group	Alison Macfarlane	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:36:03 +0000 (GMT)	109 lines
Re: negative results	Dave Sackett	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:38:27 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	127 lines
Re: negative results	Ted Harding	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:22:31 -0000 (GMT)	178 lines
JOB: Research fellow at the University of York, UK	Alison Eastwood	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:52:43 +0000	28 lines
Evidence based teaching of EBM/EBHC	Dr. G. Mustafa Soomro	Sat, 16 Jan 1999 12:15:26 -0000	38 lines
Re: TV News and EBM	Amit Ghosh	Sat, 16 Jan 1999 10:08:38 -0600	85 lines
Negative Results	Arturo Marti-Carvajal	Sat, 16 Jan 1999 13:30:04 -0400	37 lines
Meeting on food safety	Michele Panunzio	Sun, 17 Jan 1999 10:27:36 +0100	48 lines
Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)	Dave Sackett	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:45:20 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	83 lines
protocol for COAD#2 ready for review	Dave Sackett	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:06:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	43 lines
RE: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)	Jordi Gol	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 14:10:02 +0100	34 lines
RE: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)	Andre Tomlin	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 14:59:58 -0000	32 lines
Risk ranking of NSAID	Karen Rosenbloom	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 18:18:45 +0000	28 lines
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)	David & Zoe Brown	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:02:36 -1000	31 lines
Re: EBM	Simon and Jo Fitsall	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:34:39 -0000	40 lines
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)	Silvia Patrick	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:40:44 -0800 (PST)	46 lines
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor (fwd)	Nicholas R Hicks	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:43:48 -0000	54 lines
Re: EBM	Mark Fenton	Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:14:01 +0000	58 lines
Re: negative results	N.P. van Duijn	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:35:46 +0100	224 lines
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?	Dave Sackett	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:29:02 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	57 lines
World Association of Medical Editors condemns sacking	Dave Sackett	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:03:21 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	56 lines
Re:EBM reply	Barbara BOLTON	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 10:54:38 -0000	68 lines
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?	Terry Aspray	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 11:45:46 -0000	117 lines
Re: EBM	Peter Griffiths	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:12:33 +0000	50 lines
Re: EBM + mental health nursing	Dave Lloyd	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:52:14 +0000 (GMT)	60 lines
Re: EBM	D.A.Courtney	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:53:51 +0000 (GMT)	587 lines
Re: negative results	Ted Harding	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:40:17 -0000 (GMT)	57 lines
Negative vs. inconclusive results	Doggett, David	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 11:34:52 -0500	106 lines
Re: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?	Dave Sackett	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:47:30 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	56 lines
Negative Results	Arturo Marti-Carvajal	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:50:41 -0400	20 lines
Re: Negative Results	Dave Sackett	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:02:21 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	49 lines
Re: EBM	Dave Sackett	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:17:22 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	66 lines
Klebsiella and ankylosing spondylitis	Dr Fred Kavalier	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:27:18 +0000	25 lines
RE: Negative Results	Doggett, David	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:24:59 -0500	67 lines
Re: EBM	Mark Fenton	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 22:06:31 +0000	28 lines
Re: negative results	Brian Stein	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:27:22 +1000	48 lines
EBM & Mental Health Nursing	Simon and Jo Fitsall	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 00:58:31 -0000	118 lines
Can we get high powers?	<>	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 08:41:35 GMT+1200	30 lines
Re: helping our friends at JAMA	Dave Sackett	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:26:51 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	43 lines
Still places on 1st N+Y EBHC workshop	Toby Lipman 7, Collingwood Terrace, Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne. Tel 0191-2811060 (home), 0191-2869178 (surgery)	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:27:51 +0000	147 lines
Freedom of speech	Atle Klovning	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:43:31 +0100	33 lines
RE: EBM, Mental Health Nursing and peer reviewed journals	<>	20 Jan 1999 10:13:25 +0000	480 lines
Re: Klebsiella and ankylosing spondylitis	Paul Glasziou	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 20:54:47 +1000	63 lines
Evidence & Mental health nursing	Robin Snowball	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:00:07 -0000	33 lines
if you want to keep abreast of reactions to AMA's sacking of george lundberg	Dave Sackett	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:49:46 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	32 lines
Transference Factor	CDF	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:35:01 -0400	29 lines
European MSc in Health Informatics	John Bryant	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 16:46:19 +0000	49 lines
negative results response to 'Arturo Marti-Carvajal'	Doggett, David	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:16:12 -0500	53 lines
JAMA	Henry Barry	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:26:14 -0500	63 lines
Re: World Association of Medical Editors condemns sacking	<>	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 21:04:45 EST	50 lines
Re:EBM & Mental Health Nursing	Mark Fenton	Thu, 21 Jan 1999 09:58:42 +0000	61 lines
examples - evidence and nursing	Mark Newman	Thu, 21 Jan 1999 12:13:49 +0000 (GMT)	48 lines
(Fwd) examples - evidence and nursing	Mark Newman	Thu, 21 Jan 1999 16:08:51 +0000 (GMT)	70 lines
Re: JAMA	Dave Sackett	Thu, 21 Jan 1999 17:04:06 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	59 lines
RE: Sacking of JAMA's editor; the irrelevance of the subject matter, and where do we go from here?	Montori, Victor M., M.D.	Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:06:19 -0600	24 lines
Re: JAMA	Roy Poses	Thu, 21 Jan 99 16:08:47 EST	55 lines
RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg?	Dave Sackett	Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:39:14 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	56 lines
RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg? (fwd)	Dave Sackett	Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:10:03 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	70 lines
RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg?	Montori, Victor M., M.D.	Fri, 22 Jan 1999 07:23:57 -0600	106 lines
hould we boycott JAMA?	Amit Ghosh	Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:30:43 -0600	34 lines
RE: Why didn't the JAMA Editorial Board resign following the sacking of george lundberg? (fwd)	Montori, Victor M., M.D.	Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:53:12 -0600	92 lines
JAMA issue	Andrew Thomas	Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:40:08 -0500	242 lines
RE: JAMA issue	Montori, Victor M., M.D.	Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:41:53 -0600	135 lines
Inconsistent presentation within a journal article	Simon, Steve, PhD	Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:54:12 -0600	59 lines
Indexed Journals	Ronald Ingle	Sat, 23 Jan 1999 10:28:18 +0200	23 lines
Re: JAMA	Karen Ingvoldstad	Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:33:24 +0800	112 lines
Re: JAMA	Andrew Thomas	Sat, 23 Jan 1999 09:52:51 -0600	338 lines
Re: JAMA issue	Dave Sackett	Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:02:16 +0000 (GMT)	48 lines
Re: JAMA issue	Andrew Thomas	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 02:42:16 -0600	92 lines
Re: JAMA	<>	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 11:52:56	72 lines
Re: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article	Ian Bowns	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:38:07 +0000	59 lines
Re: JAMA issue	Toby Lipman 7, Collingwood Terrace, Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne. Tel 0191-2811060 (home), 0191-2869178 (surgery)	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:31:39 +0000	69 lines
Re: JAMA issue	Mark Fenton	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:34:16 +0000	28 lines
Re: JAMA issue	Dave Sackett	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:03:30 +0000 (GMT)	87 lines
EBM cardiology	Amit Ghosh	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 08:25:15 -0600	44 lines
Re: JAMA	<>	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 15:08:37	104 lines
I recommend Medscape, http://www.medscape.com.	amit ghosh	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:26:50 -0500	58 lines
Re: JAMA	Andrew Thomas	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:57:54 -0600	149 lines
FW: Change in Leadership at JAMA (fwd)	Dave Sackett	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:45:25 +0000 (GMT)	376 lines
Re: JAMA	Dave Sackett	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:59:27 +0000 (GMT)	45 lines
Re: JAMA	David & Zoe Brown	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 15:22:39 -1000	40 lines
Re: JAMA	Andrew Thomas	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:22:06 -0600	78 lines
Re: JAMA	Andrew Thomas	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:44:06 -0600	214 lines
Re: JAMA	Andrew Thomas	Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:10:02 -0600	99 lines
Re: JAMA issue	Karen Ingvoldstad	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 15:16:56 +0800	104 lines
Re: JAMA	Dave Sackett	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:47:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	29 lines
RE: indexed journals	CDF	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:01:07 -0400	29 lines
RE: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article	Albert J. Kirshen, MD, FRCPC	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 07:13:56 -0700	76 lines
RE: indexed journals	Nino Cartabellotta	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:27:19 +0100	46 lines
Other straws?	Dr. Scott Richardson	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:42:02 -0600	44 lines
Evidence based practice - distance learning course	Graeme Barber	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:36:43 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	114 lines
Re: JAMA	Susan Kaiser, M.D.	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 13:23:30 -0500	136 lines
RE: NNT or NNH	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:00:44 -0500	80 lines
Re: JAMA	<>	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:04:23	234 lines
RE: JAMA	Charles C. Engel, Jr.	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 18:24:41 -0500	42 lines
RE: NNT or NNH	lesley.kay	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 23:40:31 -0000	94 lines
Re: NNT or NNH	Peter Ellis	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:54:30 +1100	104 lines
RE: NNT or NNH	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:50:50 -0500	126 lines
Where are the Users Guides?	<>	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 22:52:13 -0600 (CST)	22 lines
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!	<>	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 06:50:29	69 lines
Re: Where are the Users Guides?	Atle Klovning	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:05:23 +0100	31 lines
Re: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article	A.J.O'rourke	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:15:27 +0000	51 lines
NNT or NNH	Andrew Jull	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:30:20 +1300	36 lines
Nursing diagnostic papers	Karen Jones	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:21:52 GMT0BST	35 lines
Critical appraisal of Qualitative research for Evidence based pr	Mark Newman	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:42:10 +0000 (GMT)	29 lines
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!	Ted Harding	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:08:10 -0000 (GMT)	58 lines
Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair	Dave Sackett	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:09:55 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	60 lines
New JAMA scandal comes to light.....	John Thompson	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:35:17 -0000	145 lines
Re: Nursing diagnostic papers	Peg Allen	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:45:27 -0600	62 lines
interesting quote found this week in JAMA.....	John Thompson	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:39:19 -0000	108 lines
Re: Where are the Users Guides?	Susan Kaiser, M.D.	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:11:49 -0500	34 lines
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH!	Simon, Steve, PhD	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:08:21 -0600	135 lines
RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair	Charles C. Engel, Jr.	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:56:59 -0500	32 lines
RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair	Susan Kaiser, M.D.	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:11:44 -0500	29 lines
JAMA editorial from this week	Andrew Thomas	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:45:24 -0600	258 lines
RE: JAMA	Trefor Roscoe	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:45:48 -0000	49 lines
RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMAaffair	Trefor Roscoe	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:45:49 -0000	66 lines
a bit more re: JAMA	Barbara Berger	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:35:48 -0600	36 lines
Re: Inconsistent presentation within a journal article -Reply -Forwarded	Daryle Gardner-Bonneau	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 19:15:05 -0500	74 lines
Re: RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair	Jim Walker	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:52:39 -0500	44 lines
Indexed Journals	Ronald Ingle	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 07:29:53 +0200	28 lines
Re: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair	Jon Wilcox	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 06:59:05 +1300	95 lines
RE: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair	Ronald Ingle	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:43:53 +0200	26 lines
Re: NNT or NNH	David Birnbaum	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 23:49:35 -0800	41 lines
RE: Nursing diagnostic papers	Andrew Jull	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 07:56:26 +1300	91 lines
Re: Where are the Users Guides?	Nino Cartabellotta	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:29:14 +0100	59 lines
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH! (fwd)	Dave Sackett	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:26:55 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	59 lines
CRitical appraisal guidelines for qualitative research	Mark Newman	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:40:44 +0000 (GMT)	48 lines
critical appraisal guidelines qualitative research	Mark Newman	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 13:04:22 +0000 (GMT)	35 lines
RE: JAMA --Publisher's BIAS is the issue for EBH! (fwd)	D.W. OWENS	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:15:22 GMT0BST	39 lines
Re: Indexed Journals	Peg Allen	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:18:42 -0600	73 lines
MetaMaps	Ricardo Pietrobon	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 10:36:01 -0500	72 lines
Re: JAMA issue	Simon and Jo Fitsall	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:00:03 -0000	21 lines
RE: NNT or NNH	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 12:40:08 -0500	35 lines
NNT or NNH	Dave Sackett	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:50:35 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	36 lines
Re: Suggestions from sackett and badenoch about further discussions of the JAMA affair	Richard Keatinge	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:47:39 +0000	23 lines
RE: NNT or NNH	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:50:49 -0500	96 lines
Workshop about journal club	Arturo Marti-Carvajal	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:15:27 -0400	27 lines
Does CQI effectively change prescribing practice?	Janet Martin	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 17:54:35 -0500	61 lines
Octreotide: Do you use it?	Janet Martin	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:11:03 -0500	40 lines
Re: EBM cardiology	Jim Walker	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 22:11:03 -0500	35 lines
Re: Octreotide: Do you use it?	Patrick J. Sousa, MD	Wed, 27 Jan 1999 19:26:26 -1000	62 lines
JAMA search	Andrew Thomas	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:30:34 -0600	685 lines
Re: JAMA search	Jim Walker	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:39:16 -0500	28 lines
Re: JAMA search	Richard Keatinge	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:55:37 +0000	43 lines
RE: JAMA search	Montori, Victor M., M.D.	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:01:03 -0600	22 lines
Re: NNT or NNH	Jeong H. Oh, MD MPH	Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:56:54 -0500	29 lines
Re: evidence based searching	N.P. van Duijn	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:50:30 +0100	58 lines
Re: evidence based searching	N.P. van Duijn	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:00:43 +0100	59 lines
Any information on EBM for Ob&G folk	padmanabhan badrinath	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 02:18:16 PST	41 lines
Re: Workshop about journal club	Andre Tomlin	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:45:59 -0000	67 lines
Users' Guides	Robin Snowball	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:46:23 -0000	15 lines
Request for suggestions	Montori, Victor M., M.D.	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:05:42 -0600	52 lines
CASP conference announcement (fwd)	Douglas Badenoch	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 17:03:32 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)	78 lines
RE: NNT or NNH	Djulbegovic, Benjamin	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:38:15 -0500	54 lines
RE: NNT or NNH	Simon, Steve, PhD	Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:24:36 -0600	62 lines

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

January 1999

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives