JISCMail - EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

June 2020

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Richard Hockey	Mon, 1 Jun 2020 00:33:05 +0000	3490 lines
Call for Papers: COVID-19 interactions with our Environment, “UCL Open: Environment”	Margie Coughlin	Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:30:09 +0100	64 lines
STATA Short Courses from Imperial College London	Krupa Shukla	Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:28:05 +0100	97 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Richard Hockey	Wed, 3 Jun 2020 02:18:40 +0000	3716 lines
Governments and WHO changed Covid-19 policy based on suspect data from tiny US company \| World news \| The Guardian	Richard Hockey	Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:51:34 +0000	79 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Anoop B	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 15:40:51 -0400	4953 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Michael Power	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:55:42 +0100	5386 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Michael Power	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:39:19 +0100	5454 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Jeremy Howick	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:39:56 +0000	3944 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Michael Power	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 22:03:58 +0100	5134 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Anoop B	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:04:29 -0400	4517 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Kelleher, Kevin	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:04:29 +0000	4040 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Jeremy Howick	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:12:47 +0000	3616 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Carlos A. Cuello Garcia	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:19:37 -0400	4908 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Michael Power	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 22:24:36 +0100	5183 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Bewley, Susan	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:09:33 +0000	3145 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Richard Hockey	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:43:31 +0000	3874 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Anoop B	Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:54:22 -0400	3700 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Federico Barbani USL	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:17:30 +0200	3769 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Richard Hockey	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:25:59 +0000	2516 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Narges Khanjani	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:56:46 +0430	4582 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Mariam Hassan	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:29:19 +0000	2556 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Mariam Hassan	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:32:06 +0000	3287 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:27:23 +0000	2748 lines
Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	Suhail Doi	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:44:29 +0300	42 lines
Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	Philipp Dahm	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:52:28 -0500	164 lines
Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	Amy Price	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:56:18 +0000	111 lines
Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	Andreas Lundh	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:11:15 +0200	370 lines
Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	Suhail Doi	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:14:27 +0300	153 lines
Re: (External Email) Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	Benson, Teresa	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:19:10 +0000	232 lines
Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	Suhail Doi	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:22:31 +0300	124 lines
Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	Philipp Dahm	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 09:33:02 -0500	470 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Anoop B	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:47:29 -0400	4119 lines
Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	Jeremy Howick	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:47:29 +0000	379 lines
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	William Grant	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:04:40 -0400	551 lines
Re: Critical Apraisal of Lancet paper	David Nunan	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:06:39 +0000	485 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	David Nunan	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:08:46 +0000	2851 lines
Covid 19: Altmetric top 20 articles by category	Ernesto Barrera	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:09:45 +0200	113 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Anoop B	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:33:18 -0400	4245 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Reynolds,Penelope Susan	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:44:59 +0000	2802 lines
Results from the RECOVERY Trial	Anoop Balachandran	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:58:05 +0100	29 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Dr Amy Price	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:49:40 -0400	2832 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Rod Jackson	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 21:54:30 +0000	2862 lines
Retracted studies may have damaged public trust in science, top researchers fear	Richard Hockey	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 23:42:31 +0000	27 lines
Hydroxychloroquine does not cure Covid-19, say drug trial chiefs	Richard Hockey	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 23:47:23 +0000	24 lines
Re: Covid 19: Altmetric top 20 articles by category	Lelia Carvalho	Fri, 5 Jun 2020 21:41:22 -0300	170 lines
The use of evidence to inform response efforts during infectious epidemics-looking for participants	Vindrola, Cecilia	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:06:11 +0000	235 lines
ROBIS 2 tool	K Hopayian	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 13:15:22 +0100	123 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Ashok Handa	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 12:22:06 +0000	4249 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 14:02:54 +0000	3035 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Jim Walker	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 13:28:12 -0400	3942 lines
Re: ROBIS 2 tool	Aamer Imdad	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 14:29:22 -0400	126 lines
Re: ROBIS 2 tool	Manitoba Hunter	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 18:43:24 +0000	172 lines
Re: ROBIS 2 tool	K Hopayian	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 19:44:15 +0100	185 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	Rod Jackson	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 20:49:45 +0000	3068 lines
Re: ROBIS 2 tool	Aamer Imdad	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 16:52:42 -0400	201 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	David Nunan	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 21:06:37 +0000	3092 lines
Has Sweden made a fatal mistake?	Rod Jackson	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 21:24:06 +0000	146 lines
Re: Has Sweden made a fatal mistake?	Rod Jackson	Sat, 6 Jun 2020 22:50:40 +0000	467 lines
Re: Has Sweden made a fatal mistake?	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 00:00:48 +0000	538 lines
Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Rod Jackson	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 00:28:01 +0000	80 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Michael Power	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 10:19:09 +0100	228 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Mohammed T. Ansari	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 06:37:30 -0400	302 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 12:33:28 +0000	378 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Anoop B	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 08:36:20 -0400	294 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 13:35:18 +0000	391 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Wouter Havinga	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:47:14 +0100	632 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:06:47 +0000	660 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Rod Jackson	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 19:26:43 +0000	311 lines
Lancet	Jeremy Howick	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:36:11 +0000	527 lines
Re: Lancet	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 20:44:36 +0000	581 lines
Re: Lancet	Rod Jackson	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 21:02:38 +0000	556 lines
Bradford-Hill’s thoughts on ‘some things to consider’ when assessing causality: that’s the approach GRADE should have taken as well	Rod Jackson	Sun, 7 Jun 2020 22:20:01 +0000	263 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Anoop B	Mon, 8 Jun 2020 00:04:14 -0400	596 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Mon, 8 Jun 2020 12:51:23 +0000	492 lines
Computer Programs for Semi-Automation of Evidence	Farhad Shokraneh	Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:45:13 +0100	102 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	joseph ana	Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:47:55 +0100	4086 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper	David Nunan	Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:57:56 +0000	3065 lines
Call for Papers - NVivo Virtual Conference	Silvana di Gregorio	Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:05:35 +0000	66 lines
Re: Re Critical Appraisal of Lancet paper....Lockdowns are a powerful tool	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:42:06 +0000	3462 lines
Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Wouter Havinga	Tue, 9 Jun 2020 21:13:41 +0100	926 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	joseph ana	Tue, 9 Jun 2020 23:40:57 +0100	921 lines
WHO on asymptomatic coronavirus spread.	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Tue, 9 Jun 2020 23:46:16 +0000	58 lines
THIS Institute fellowship opportunity	Hannah Flack	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:47:24 +0000	204 lines
Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:37:19 +0000	89 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	EGW BWC	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:58:25 +0100	151 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:01:38 +0000	122 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:37:35 +0000	259 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	EGW BWC	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:48:45 +0100	226 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	Kelleher, Kevin	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:53:09 +0000	382 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	Alfredo Serrano	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:23:55 +0200	582 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	Rod Jackson	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:58:28 +0000	279 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	Christie A	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:37:37 -0600	474 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	Dan Mayer	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:00:00 -0400	500 lines
Surgisphere: mass audit of papers linked to firm behind hydroxychloroquine Lancet study scandal	Richard Hockey	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:06:40 +0000	27 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Anoop B	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:54:18 -0400	735 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 01:07:59 +0000	701 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Mohammed T. Ansari	Wed, 10 Jun 2020 21:52:22 -0400	1100 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Ashley Kennedy	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 03:26:52 +0000	821 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	joseph ana	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:37:48 +0000	659 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:39:46 +0000	903 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Mohammed T. Ansari	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:01:00 -0400	1463 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Ashley Kennedy	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 14:33:08 +0000	1040 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Donald E. Stanley	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 14:50:50 +0000	416 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Jeremy Howick	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 14:54:23 +0000	1187 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Ashley Kennedy	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 14:57:50 +0000	1788 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:07:08 +0000	1425 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:31:25 +0000	1526 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Rakesh Biswas	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:36:14 +0530	2304 lines
Re: Coronavirus: Cause of death and morbidity	Myles, Nickolas [PH]	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 17:07:55 +0000	631 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Anoop B	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:06:07 -0400	1459 lines
Fwd: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Donald E. Stanley	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:07:06 +0000	894 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:34:23 +0000	963 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Thu, 11 Jun 2020 23:34:26 +0000	963 lines
Fwd: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Donald E. Stanley	Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:09:16 +0000	424 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Rakesh Biswas	Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:32:43 +0530	1529 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Anoop B	Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:16:55 -0400	1580 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Rakesh Biswas	Sat, 13 Jun 2020 21:02:53 +0530	1619 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Mohammed T. Ansari	Sat, 13 Jun 2020 11:42:12 -0400	1656 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Rakesh Biswas	Sat, 13 Jun 2020 21:33:47 +0530	1691 lines
Is transparency dangerous to science?	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:46:00 +0000	193 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Wouter Havinga	Sun, 14 Jun 2020 10:32:30 +0100	1809 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:08:22 +0000	1266 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Sun, 14 Jun 2020 13:00:12 +0000	1445 lines
Re: Good Science Is Good Science For the sake of both science and action in the COVID-19 pandemic, we need collaboration among specialists, not sects.	Michael Bennett	Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:49:19 +0000	1519 lines
Webinar on the evaluation of COVID-19 diagnostics with BLCMs	Polychronis Kostoulas	Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:51:03 +0000	318 lines
From BBC world service: Coronavirus: first life-saving drug	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:23:24 +0000	47 lines
WHO halts trial of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients	Manitoba Hunter	Wed, 17 Jun 2020 21:53:45 +0000	93 lines
Re: WHO halts trial of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients	Jeremy Howick	Thu, 18 Jun 2020 07:55:18 +0000	152 lines
Invitation to attend Prof. Blanca Rodriguez talk "Augmenting drug development and cardiology with computer science"	ACM-W UK	Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:51:59 +0100	130 lines
Imperial College London - Data Management and Statistical Analysis using SPSS	Krupa Shukla	Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:14:38 +0100	101 lines
NVivo Virtual Conference Qualitative Research in a Changing World	Silvana di Gregorio	Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:04:45 +0000	64 lines
Call for papers: Evidence & Policy special issue -The many faces of disability in evidence for policy and practice	Thea Cook	Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:08:03 +0100	300 lines
Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:30:30 +0000	69 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Dan Mayer	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:29:10 -0400	141 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:59:33 +0000	133 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Alfredo Serrano Moraza	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:15:49 +0200	624 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Jeremy Howick	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:19:58 +0000	280 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:30:20 +0000	439 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Jeremy Howick	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:04:52 +0000	457 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Emily Gmail	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:23:10 -0400	665 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:25:58 +0000	562 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	David Richard Leslie Cawthorpe	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 16:40:24 +0000	504 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Jeremy Howick	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:26:46 +0000	584 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Rod Jackson	Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:22:00 +0000	1800 lines
Fwd: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 - why comparing reported test results by country are meaningless	Rod Jackson	Sun, 28 Jun 2020 06:17:13 +0000	1829 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Jeremy Howick	Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:38:25 +0000	575 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Rod Jackson	Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:45:21 +0000	577 lines
Re: Association between Influenza Vaccination Rates and SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Infection Rates in OECD Countries	Benjamin Djulbegovic MD	Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:08:32 +0000	617 lines
Statistical Modelling using SPSS (2-days course) - Imperial College London	Krupa Shukla	Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:27:28 +0100	85 lines
Introduction to test evaluation with BLCMs. An example on COVID-19 diagnostics	Polychronis Kostoulas	Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:17:09 +0000	153 lines

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

June 2020

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives