JISCMail - RAMESES Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

RAMESES Archives

September 2019

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		RAMESES Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Question	Sonia Dalkin	Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:59:25 +0000	885 lines
the search for links new materialism, agential realism and realist methods	Judith Lovell	Thu, 5 Sep 2019 23:31:51 +0000	156 lines
Philosophical roots of realist evaluation	Giao Vu Thi Quynh	Sat, 7 Sep 2019 19:20:40 +0000	103 lines
Re: Philosophical roots of realist evaluation	Peter O'Halloran	Sun, 8 Sep 2019 09:03:49 +0000	225 lines
Re: Philosophical roots of realist evaluation	Giao Vu Thi Quynh	Sun, 8 Sep 2019 11:09:55 +0000	448 lines
Re: identifying the negative resource component of a CMO	Kenneth Yakubu	Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:23:45 +0000	3366 lines
Quantitative theory testing	Christina Mutschler	Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:16:20 +0000	116 lines
Philosophical roots of realist evaluation	Jagosh, Justin	Sun, 8 Sep 2019 22:55:15 +0000	483 lines
Re: Philosophical roots of realist evaluation	Gerda Warnholtz	Sun, 8 Sep 2019 23:47:14 +0000	628 lines
Re: Philosophical roots of realist evaluation	joseph rylands	Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:26:22 +0100	152 lines
Realist Reviews & Realist Evaluation course 25-29 Nov 2019	University of Oxford CPD Centre	Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:30:01 +0100	1636 lines
Re: Quantitative theory testing	Jagosh, Justin	Tue, 10 Sep 2019 23:51:38 +0000	308 lines
Re: Quantitative theory testing	Giao Vu Thi Quynh	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:47:06 +0000	430 lines
Re: Quantitative theory testing	Groot, E. de	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:39:09 +0000	743 lines
Realist2020 Call for Abstracts is OPEN!	Rebecca Hardwick	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:46:53 +0000	1258 lines
VS: Quantitative theory testing	Aaltio, Elina	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:27:32 +0000	872 lines
Re: Quantitative theory testing	Nick Emmel	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:04:07 +0000	1309 lines
Re: Quantitative theory testing	Christina Mutschler	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:01:32 +0000	1150 lines
Saturation	Nicole Miller	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:41:02 +0100	33 lines
Re: Saturation	Cottrell, Laura	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:17:43 +0000	63 lines
Re: Philosophical roots of realist evaluation	Giao Vu Thi Quynh	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 21:38:14 +0000	857 lines
Existing realist review- digital literacy/interventions for health/ ? loneliness	Allen C.E.W.	Thu, 12 Sep 2019 21:54:50 +0000	83 lines
Re: Existing realist review- digital literacy/interventions for health/ ? loneliness	Laurence Piercy	Fri, 13 Sep 2019 05:46:03 +0000	145 lines
Re: Saturation	Andrew Booth	Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:21:23 +0100	297 lines
Re: Saturation	Janet L Harris	Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:01:13 +0100	374 lines
Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	Andrew Booth	Sun, 15 Sep 2019 11:08:03 +0100	131 lines
Convince my supervisor!	Becky Cridford	Sun, 15 Sep 2019 18:36:24 +0000	81 lines
Re: Convince my supervisor!	Gill Westhorp	Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:48:05 +1000	3696 lines
Re: Convince my supervisor!	Gill Westhorp	Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:52:34 +1000	216 lines
Re: Convince my supervisor!	Rasha Okasheh	Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:54:40 +0000	210 lines
Re: Quantitative theory testing	Hugh Waddington	Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:49:57 +0100	189 lines
Re: RRR versus realist synthesis	Vanessa Abrahamson	Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:03:58 +0000	86 lines
Re: RRR versus realist synthesis	Rasha Okasheh	Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:14:14 +0000	220 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	Jagosh, Justin	Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:31:28 +0000	276 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	Andrew Booth	Fri, 20 Sep 2019 08:12:37 +0100	335 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	ALLISON Mary	Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:47:45 +0000	689 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	Andrew Booth	Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:34:39 +0100	663 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	Penny Haora	Wed, 25 Sep 2019 02:18:38 +0000	11622 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	Rasha Okasheh	Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:19:52 +0000	12005 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	ALLISON Mary	Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:46:31 +0000	12105 lines
Search for RE collaborator	Penny Lewis	Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:07:18 +0000	139 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	Raymond Pawson	Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:23:27 +0000	12205 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	Simon Carroll	Sun, 29 Sep 2019 09:50:34 -0700	1417 lines
Re: Three Rs not two (Rigour/Relevance)?	Andrew Booth	Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:07:11 +0100	1731 lines