|
|
|
Size
|
Re: Realistic Evaluation
|
Geoff Wong |
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:24:18 +0000 |
302 lines |
Realistic Evaluation
|
Sandeep Reddy |
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:34:33 +0000 |
917 lines |
Re: the "so what?" question in meta-narrative reviews
|
Trish Greenhalgh |
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:53:24 +0000 |
871 lines |
Reviewers for realist reviews of management
|
Trish Greenhalgh |
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:52:57 +0000 |
128 lines |
Massey University Doctorial Scholarship (College of Health)
|
Geoff Wong |
Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:06:55 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: about the differences realist review/realist evaluation
|
Alexandra Reith |
Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:59:14 +0100 |
17 lines |
Re: How to apply the "principle of peer review" as a doctoral candidate
|
Kelly, Shona |
Thu, 2 Oct 2014 08:52:11 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: How to apply the "principle of peer review" as a doctoral candidate
|
Gill Westhorp |
Wed, 1 Oct 2014 18:52:55 +0100 |
82 lines |
Re: about the differences realist review/realist evaluation
|
Gill Westhorp |
Wed, 1 Oct 2014 18:52:55 +0100 |
42 lines |
about the differences realist review/realist evaluation
|
Alexandra Reith |
Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:38:56 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: How to apply the "principle of peer review" as a doctoral candidate
|
Alexandra Reith |
Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:36:33 +0100 |
52 lines |