JISCMail - EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

February 2009

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	Date	Size
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:38:27 -0800	521 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:02:19 -0800	592 lines
Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:55:03 +0000	90 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:01:37 -0500	1170 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:03:00 -0800	117 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:05:13 -0500	275 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:06:21 +0000	179 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:07:15 -0500	221 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:22 -0000	792 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:50:22 +0530	186 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:49:44 -0800	741 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:06:17 -0500	911 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:14:42 +0000	1335 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:31:58 -0800	911 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:45:40 +0000	215 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:00:11 -0800	971 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:06:14 +0000	454 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:40:19 +0000	1407 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:55:27 -0800	1084 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:55:59 -0800	1084 lines
Re: Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:34:34 +0100	23 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:21:30 -0500	480 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:46:34 -0000	322 lines
Re: Help Needed	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:50:49 -0500	145 lines
Re: [Consumers] Mammography Screening Info from BMJonline	Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:19:04 +1000	307 lines
Re: Help Needed	Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:57:28 +0000	76 lines
Re: Help Needed	Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:43:54 -0000	102 lines
Re: Help Needed	Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:55:04 +0000	294 lines
2nd February edition of Journal Watch	Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:09:57 +0000	36 lines
Unsubscribe	Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:44:28 -0600	162 lines
unsubscribe	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:50:39 -0800	22 lines
quick question/poll	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:38:58 -0600	93 lines
Re: quick question/poll	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:34:25 -0800	116 lines
Re: quick question/poll	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:43:19 -0500	649 lines
Re: quick question/poll	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:54:37 +0000	111 lines
Launch of the new CEBM Website	Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:45:21 +0000	45 lines
Search filter website	Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:05:56 -0200	16 lines
Anna Donald - sad news	Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:10:26 +0000	39 lines
Re: Anna Donald - sad news	Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:58:28 +0000	165 lines
Re: Anna Donald - sad news	Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:55:09 -0000	59 lines
Cochrane Collaboration and Pubmed are now on... Twitter	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:34:04 -0000	183 lines
CRD's Guidance for undertaking systematic reviews	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:19:57 -0000	128 lines
Richard Lehman's Journal Watch	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:33:57 +0000	32 lines
An invitation to attend the EBHC-KT acquainting ceremony and launcing of its website	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:22:12 -0800	1761 lines
HINARI: Hoax for India	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:52:48 +0000	122 lines
Re: HINARI: Hoax for India	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:35:53 +0000	616 lines
House keeping Please?	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:41:09 +0000	189 lines
Re: House keeping Please?	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:01:51 +0000	109 lines
Lack of healthcare information threatens patient safety, say leading health agencies	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:31:35 +0000	222 lines
making meta-analyses more consumer friendly	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:58:59 -0500	71 lines
FW: Breaking News Alert	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:42:07 +0000	393 lines
Re: Breaking News Alert	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:41:42 -0800	23579 lines
Career Development Fellow (Post-doctoral) positions, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:17:31 +0000	75 lines
Conflict of Interest policy tracking	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:00:30 -0200	13 lines
Re: Politics	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:58:05 +0000	51 lines
Re: Politics	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:02:33 -0000	67 lines
Job vacancy - Research Fellow	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:10:27 +0000	68 lines
Re: Politics	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:10:31 +0000	198 lines
Re: Politics	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:21:58 +0000	44 lines
Re: Politics	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:06:52 -0600	176 lines
Re: Politics	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:50:09 +0100	177 lines
Survival curve question	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:27 -0500	33 lines
Re: Survival curve question	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:00:34 +0200	62 lines
Re: Survival curve question	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:06:50 -0500	50 lines
Re: Politics	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:39:55 +1300	588 lines
Medicaid and NHI - NEJM piece	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:22:48 +0000	211 lines
R: Politics	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:49:21 +0100	94 lines
Re: Survival curve question	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:19:02 +0000	64 lines
Re: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:06:26 +0100	41 lines
EBM meets CV	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:26:58 +0000	92 lines
Re: R: Politics	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:45:22 -0800	19 lines
Re: EBM meets CV	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:20:05 -0500	821 lines
Re: EBM meets CV	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:44:10 -0600	987 lines
Survival curves	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:57:54 -0500	25 lines
Re: Survival curve question	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:29:15 -0500	14702 lines
R: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:40:35 +0100	72 lines
job opportunities in knowledge translation at University of York	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:41:46 +0000	35 lines
Clinical policy guidelines	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:54:38 -0600	26 lines
Re: Clinical policy guidelines	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:48:22 +0100	67 lines
Journal Watch	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:22:37 +0000	33 lines
Re: Clinical policy guidelines	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:35:47 -0600	134 lines
Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:21:13 -0600	24 lines
Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:50:53 -0500	47 lines
RES: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:00:23 -0300	41 lines
Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:09:35 -0800	83 lines
Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:46:06 -0600	186 lines
Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:05:14 -0300	79 lines
Re: A question of diagnosis or therapy	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:58:11 +1100	113 lines
Re: A question of diagnosis or therapy	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:26:31 -0500	77 lines
Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:08:25 +0000	30 lines
Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:17:42 +0000	338 lines
SV: Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:59:44 +0100	590 lines
Photovoice	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:35:08 -0600	33 lines
Re: Photovoice	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:54:52 +0100	42 lines
Re: Photovoice	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:28:13 -0600	57 lines
Re: Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:03:45 +0000	138 lines
Re: SV: Qualitative research and PICO or PECOT & CASP checklists	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:15:52 +0000	450 lines
Re: SV: Qualitative research and PICO	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:16:43 +1000	462 lines
Re: SV: Qualitative research and PICO	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:03:52 +1030	814 lines
Re: SV: Qualitative research and PICO	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:52:13 -0600	76 lines
R: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:46:10 +0100	72 lines
SV: SV: Qualitative research and PICO	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:51:20 +0100	785 lines
Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:01:28 -0500	61 lines
Qualitative research and PICO	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:09:16 +0000	2453 lines
Re: Qualitative research and PICO	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:20:07 -0500	1370 lines
Re: Qualitative research and PICO	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:45:25 +0000	1150 lines
24th February issue of Journal Watch	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:09:38 +0000	34 lines
Re: Cochrane Job opportunity	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:19:26 +0000	82 lines
R: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:10:16 +0100	71 lines
Re: R: making meta-analyses more consumer friendly	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:58:55 +0530	194 lines
FW: Expression of Interest	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:47:56 +1030	3280 lines
Re: Basic question about diagnostic versus prognostic studies	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:12:49 +0530	180 lines
MAY 2009 COURSE: How to Practice Evidence-Based Child Health	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:06:53 +0000	121 lines
GRADE evidence profile table	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:22:01 -0500	55 lines
Re: GRADE evidence profile table	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:07:38 -0800	146 lines
Re: GRADE evidence profile table	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:09:48 -0600	220 lines
GRADE vs. SORT for evidence rating	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:44:44 -0500	935 lines
Senior Research Fellow in Healthcare Innovation - two posts (£34,909.20-£44,290.00 pa)	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:22:51 +0000	303 lines