JISCMail - RADSTATS Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

RADSTATS Archives

October 2007

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		RADSTATS Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: How the US Middle Class Became 10 Percent Poorer; India's Economic Growth and Outlook [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	R.Thomas	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:38:54 +0100	253 lines
Re: How the US Middle Class Became 10 Percent Poorer; India's Economic Growth and Outlook [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Paul Bivand	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:56:17 +0100	260 lines
Re: How the US Middle Class Became 10 Percent Poorer; India's Economic Growth and Outlook [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Moore, Robert	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:09:31 +0100	751 lines
Re: How the US Middle Class Became 10 Percent Poorer; India's Economic Growth and Outlook [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	R.Thomas	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:06:04 +0100	280 lines
Re: How the US Middle Class Became 10 Percent Poorer; India's Economic Growth and Outlook [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Paul Bivand	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:31:34 +0100	301 lines
Re: How the US Middle Class Became 10 Percent Poorer; India's Economic Growth and Outlook [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	BYRNE D.S.	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:52:12 +0100	43 lines
HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	R.Thomas	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:31:04 +0100	207 lines
emmiseration: not a good word?	Jane Galbraith	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:16:36 +0100	126 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	John Bibby	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:13:24 +0100	716 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	Martin Rathfelder	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:57:29 +0100	564 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	R.Thomas	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:09:17 +0100	848 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	R.Thomas	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:29:02 +0100	244 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	Mike Brewer	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:30:09 +0100	108 lines
Tax Burden in the UK	BYRNE D.S.	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:42:36 +0100	92 lines
Re: emmiseration: not a good word?	BYRNE D.S.	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:20:10 +0100	21 lines
Re: emmiseration: not a good word?	Jane Galbraith	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:28:23 +0100	42 lines
Re: emmiseration: not a good word?	Bland, M.	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:57:54 +0100	75 lines
Re: emmiseration: not a good word?	BYRNE D.S.	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:39:25 +0100	106 lines
Re: emmiseration: not a good word?	Stephen McKay	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:46:32 +0100	109 lines
Re: emmiseration: not a good word?	Paul Bivand	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:47:30 +0100	120 lines
Re: emmiseration: not a good word?	Ursula Huws	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:28:09 +0100	121 lines
Re: emmiseration: not a good word?	Gavin and Rosemary Ross	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:59:02 +0100	161 lines
Re: emmiseration: not a good word?	Jane Galbraith	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:48:51 +0100	66 lines
Re: immiseration: a good word?	Jeff Evans	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:41:06 +0100	228 lines
CALL FOR REVIEWS	E M Campbell	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:43:59 +0100	703 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	R.Thomas	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:35:38 +0100	539 lines
Re: immiseration: a good word?	Vicenç Meléndez	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:41:30 +0200	279 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	Mike Brewer	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:45:19 +0100	65 lines
Data on social change re household resources	BYRNE D.S.	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:55:52 +0100	110 lines
Re: Data on social change re household resources	Mike Brewer	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:01:44 +0100	93 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	R.Thomas	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:52:02 +0100	128 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Harry Feldman	Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:54:31 +1000	121 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	Wells, Julian	Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:40:54 +0100	54 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	John Bibby	Sat, 6 Oct 2007 11:45:37 +0100	90 lines
Message from a Russian oligarch (It's a pity that every good tax-raising idea has to be wrapped up in xenophobia.)	John Bibby	Sat, 6 Oct 2007 11:45:38 +0100	197 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	John Bibby	Sat, 6 Oct 2007 11:45:38 +0100	130 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	R.Thomas	Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:38:00 +0100	545 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	Martin Rathfelder	Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:20:31 +0100	309 lines
Last call: CFP for Radstats 2008	Robin Rice	Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:04:46 +0100	65 lines
FW: conf 08 reminder	R.Thomas	Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:26:56 +0100	153 lines
Re: conf 08 reminder	BYRNE D.S.	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:06:13 +0100	64 lines
Re: conf 08 reminder	J R M Shapiro	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:17:55 +0100	185 lines
Re: conf 08 reminder	R.Thomas	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:32:05 +0100	128 lines
Re: conf 08 reminder	Dave Gordon	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:12:50 +0100	89 lines
Back to real issues	BYRNE D.S.	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:42:36 +0100	97 lines
FW: Next OS Section meeting - 18 October - ONS Statistical Priorities and Engagement with the Statistics Board	R.Thomas	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:50:28 +0100	254 lines
Re: HOW MANY UK RESIDENTS WITH NON-DOMICILE TAX STATUS?	R.Thomas	Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:43:59 +0100	778 lines
RSS meeting on Multilevel Modelling	Anthony Fielding	Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:18:36 +0100	77 lines
THES opinion leader	Janet Shapiro	Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:40:21 +0100	31 lines
FW: Proposed book: How Statistics Shape Society's Vision of Itself'	R.Thomas	Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:39:20 +0100	212 lines
DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR BOOK ON THE SOCIAL CONSTRUTCION OF STATISTICS	R.Thomas	Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:23:39 +0100	275 lines
Re: DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR BOOK ON THE SOCIAL CONSTRUTCION OF STATISTICS	R.Thomas	Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:35:08 +0100	333 lines
Re: DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR BOOK ON THE SOCIAL CONSTRUTCION OF STATISTICS	kornbrot	Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:39:56 +0100	486 lines
FW: PSA News British Statistics seminar 29 Oct 20007	Malcolm Williams	Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:48:23 +0100	518 lines
Comprehensive Spending Review	Paul Spicker	Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:40:29 +0100	57 lines
Re: Comprehensive Spending Review	Mike Brewer	Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:55:13 +0100	86 lines
the Political Economy of data	Mike Brewer	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:23:07 +0100	35 lines
Re: Comprehensive Spending Review	Simon Briscoe	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:42:04 +0100	156 lines
Re: Comprehensive Spending Review	R.Thomas	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:37:52 +0100	240 lines
FW: New Health Information Specialists Conference	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:28:48 +0100	806 lines
ONS House style and author's guide	Wells, Julian	Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:39:02 +0100	45 lines
JOB VACANCY: STATISTICIAN GE683	Lisa Summers	Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:24:51 +0100	106 lines
Re: the Political Economy of data	R.Thomas	Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:43:56 +0100	64 lines
Re: the Political Economy of data [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Harry Feldman	Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:38:11 +1000	117 lines
Re: the Political Economy of data [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Peter Timusk	Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:08:58 -0400	171 lines
Forthcoming events from ESDS Government	Gill Meadows	Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:50:45 +0100	107 lines
FW: [Fwd: 3 November leaflet]	Janet Shapiro	Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:14:18 +0100	36 lines
More about Lockheed Martin and the census	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:35:52 +0100	33 lines
Er .... Is this appropriate for the RadStats list? RE: JOB VACANCY: STATISTICIAN GE683	John Bibby	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:36:09 +0100	121 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census	alan truelove	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:04:35 -0400	35 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census	David Elliman	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:13:10 +0100	105 lines
Re: Er .... Is this appropriate for the RadStats list? RE: JOB VACANCY: STATISTICIAN GE683	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:48:18 +0100	166 lines
Re: the Political Economy of data [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	R.Thomas	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:07:59 +0100	226 lines
More about Lockheed Martin and the census	ScienceSources	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:16:19 +0100	74 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:30:50 +0100	93 lines
Rabid right-wingers may be more acceptable than bland job-ads	Bland, M.	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:52:06 +0100	47 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census	John Whittington	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:35:38 +0100	58 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census	Paul Bivand	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:21:24 +0100	116 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census	John Whittington	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:20:16 +0100	63 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census	Ursula	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:48:27 +0100	338 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Harry Feldman	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:37:26 +1100	210 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	ScienceSources	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:07:53 -0000	281 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	R.Thomas	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:30:28 -0000	1075 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	R.Thomas	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:58:46 -0000	999 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Jane Galbraith	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:44:06 -0000	347 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:16:18 -0000	376 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Paul Bivand	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:36:22 +0000	336 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	John Whittington	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:54:52 +0000	58 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Harry Feldman	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:48:15 +1100	412 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Harry Feldman	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:03:24 +1100	328 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Jeff Evans	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:06:57 +0000	425 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Harry Feldman	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:30:36 +1100	119 lines
Re: More about Lockheed Martin and the census [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	R.Thomas	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:26:56 -0000	232 lines
Re: Immigration - 38% error? Statistics Anxiety.	Ted Harding	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:30:30 +0100	73 lines
Immigration - 38% error? Statistics Anxiety.	John Bibby	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:57:35 -0000	298 lines
OUT OF ORDER MESSAGES	R.Thomas	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:59:02 -0000	683 lines
Re: Immigration - 38% error? Statistics Anxiety.	Paul Bivand	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:42:33 +0000	128 lines
Re: OUT OF ORDER MESSAGES	John Whittington	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:33:52 +0000	77 lines
Re: Immigration - 38% error? Statistics Anxiety.	Mike Brewer	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:12:25 +0000	41 lines
Re: Immigration - 38% error? Statistics Anxiety.	Paul Bivand	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:21:26 +0000	96 lines
Re: OUT OF ORDER MESSAGES	Bland, M.	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:29:52 +0000	94 lines
Re: OUT OF ORDER MESSAGES	John Whittington	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:59:40 +0000	125 lines
Re: OUT OF ORDER MESSAGES	R.Thomas	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:53:52 -0000	301 lines
Re: Immigration - 38% error? Statistics Anxiety.	R.Thomas	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:41:56 -0000	425 lines
Re: OUT OF ORDER MESSAGES	John Whittington	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:03:16 +0000	90 lines
Re: OUT OF ORDER MESSAGES	Ursula Huws	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:43:43 -0000	656 lines
Re: OUT OF ORDER MESSAGES	John Whittington	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:13:52 +0000	61 lines
Re: OUT OF ORDER MESSAGES [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]	Harry Feldman	Thu, 1 Nov 2007 07:41:45 +1100	100 lines
Re: Immigration - 38% error? Statistics Anxiety.	John Bibby	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:00:37 -0000	123 lines

RADSTATS Archives

October 2007

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives