JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for Archive Search


Archive Search

Archive Search

DC-GENERAL Home

DC-GENERAL Home



Search For

Help for String

Help for Substring

 

Advanced Search

Help for Subject Contains

Help for Author's Address

Help for Since

Help for Until



WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK ( 16 matches. )


Item #

Date

Time

From

Subject

005900 2012-11-11 19:45 msclrhd@googlemail.com Re: Dublin Core
005809 2011-10-18 08:49 marie-claude.cote@tbs-sct.gc.ca Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
005807 2011-10-17 22:42 corey.harper@nyu.edu Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
005799 2011-10-04 14:41 rod.covell@naa.gov.au Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
005797 2011-09-30 09:47 hans.overbeek@ictu.nl FW: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
005795 2011-09-29 15:26 rod.covell@naa.gov.au DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
005796 2011-09-29 12:02 marie-claude.cote@tbs-sct.gc.ca Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
005541 2010-01-14 16:04 pete.johnston@eduserv.org.uk Re: Dublin Core review of HTML5
005540 2010-01-14 09:19 danbri@danbri.org Re: Dublin Core review of HTML5
005539 2010-01-13 22:25 masinter@adobe.com Dublin Core review of HTML5
005411 2009-01-05 13:52 david.bromage@naa.gov.au Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
005410 2009-01-04 19:47 jphipps@madcreek.com Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
005405 2009-01-04 12:16 liddy@sunriseresearch.org Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
005406 2009-01-04 08:10 mikael@nilsson.name SV: Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
005407 2009-01-04 07:50 kcoylenet@gmail.com Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
005404 2009-01-03 23:22 mikael@nilsson.name Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML

Item #5900 (11 Nov 2012 19:45) - Re: Dublin Core
3. RDFa (http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-rdfa-core-20120607/)
4. HTML5 microdata
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/microdata.html#microdata)
Depending on your needs (compatibility, W3C standards compliance, use
other HTML5 features, pick up by search engines), the capabilities of
the version of word press you are using and complexity of what you are


Item #5809 (18 Oct 2011 08:49) - Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Comments: To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: Côté, Marie-Claude; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

we continue to refine our own thinking about DC Metadata expressed in
HTML5.

> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>
> In the Government of Canada, we faced two issues with Dublin Core metadata encoding when we adopted HTML5.
>
>
> As for the validation of the 55 DCTERMS properties, my colleague Elizabeth Hostetter registered them as proposals through the HTML5 MetaExtensions Wiki, and they were approved about two weeks ago. Please note that the recently approved extension values for the name="" attribute of the HTML5 <meta> element may take some time to be recognized by HTML5 validators. For more information, please see: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions
>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>
> Are there any recommendations on using DC in HTML5 given the scheme attribute of the meta tag has been deprecated?
>
>
> We have had a query from someone struggling to get a HTML5 document to validate.
>


Item #5807 (17 Oct 2011 22:42) - Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: Corey A Harper <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Comments: cc: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
we continue to refine our own thinking about DC Metadata expressed in
HTML5.

> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>
> In the Government of Canada, we faced two issues with Dublin Core metadata encoding when we adopted HTML5.
>
>
> As for the validation of the 55 DCTERMS properties, my colleague Elizabeth Hostetter registered them as proposals through the HTML5 MetaExtensions Wiki, and they were approved about two weeks ago. Please note that the recently approved extension values for the name=”” attribute of the HTML5 <meta> element may take some time to be recognized by HTML5 validators. For more information, please see: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions
>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>
> Are there any recommendations on using DC in HTML5 given the scheme attribute of the meta tag has been deprecated?
>
>
> We have had a query from someone struggling to get a HTML5 document to validate.
>


Item #5799 (4 Oct 2011 14:41) - Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: Rod Covell <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Comments: To: Côté, Marie-Claude
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


In the Government of Canada, we faced two issues with Dublin Core metadata encoding when we adopted HTML5.


As for the validation of the 55 DCTERMS properties, my colleague Elizabeth Hostetter registered them as proposals through the HTML5 MetaExtensions Wiki, and they were approved about two weeks ago. Please note that the recently approved extension values for the name="" attribute of the HTML5 <meta> element may take some time to be recognized by HTML5 validators. For more information, please see: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions

To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Are there any recommendations on using DC in HTML5 given the scheme attribute of the meta tag has been deprecated?


We have had a query from someone struggling to get a HTML5 document to validate.


Item #5797 (30 Sep 2011 09:47) - FW: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: Hans Overbeek <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: FW: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
MIME-Version: 1.0

I forwarded this useful discussion to the dc-architecture maillist, hoping that will lead to a DCMI point-of-view on Dublin Core in HTML5. It might generate a lot of discussion which is not of interest for everybody on the dc-general maillist.


This is becoming a burning question for some people now. Are there plans to review the DC-HTML specification [1] for HTML5? There is only one hit when searching for text about HTML5 on th DCMI website[2]. It is unfortunately a dead link to the technical comments on draft specifications for HTML5.

Does anybody know what the status is of the HTML5 MetaExtensions Wiki [3]?
There is a registered extension for "dc.date.issued" as well as a for both dc.language *and* dcterms.language with the remark that "dc.language is preferred by several web validators over dcterms.language".

In the Government of Canada, we faced two issues with Dublin Core metadata encoding when we adopted HTML5.


As for the validation of the 55 DCTERMS properties, my colleague Elizabeth Hostetter registered them as proposals through the HTML5 MetaExtensions Wiki, and they were approved about two weeks ago. Please note that the recently approved extension values for the name="" attribute of the HTML5 <meta> element may take some time to be recognized by HTML5 validators. For more information, please see: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions

To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Are there any recommendations on using DC in HTML5 given the scheme attribute of the meta tag has been deprecated?


We have had a query from someone struggling to get a HTML5 document to validate.


Item #5795 (29 Sep 2011 15:26) - DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: Rod Covell <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
MIME-Version: 1.0

Are there any recommendations on using DC in HTML5 given the scheme
attribute of the meta tag has been deprecated?

We have had a query from someone struggling to get a HTML5 document to
validate.


Item #5796 (29 Sep 2011 12:02) - Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Comments: cc: "[log in to unmask]"

In the Government of Canada, we faced two issues with Dublin Core metadata encoding when we adopted HTML5.

2) DCTERMS validation
As for the validation of the 55 DCTERMS properties, my colleague Elizabeth Hostetter registered them as proposals through the HTML5 MetaExtensions Wiki, and they were approved about two weeks ago. Please note that the recently approved extension values for the name="" attribute of the HTML5 <meta> element may take some time to be recognized by HTML5 validators. For more information, please see: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions

To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: DC and HTML5 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]


Are there any recommendations on using DC in HTML5 given the scheme attribute of the meta tag has been deprecated?

We have had a query from someone struggling to get a HTML5 document to validate.


Item #5541 (14 Jan 2010 16:04) - Re: Dublin Core review of HTML5
From: Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Dublin Core review of HTML5
Comments: To: Julian Reschke <[log in to unmask]>
>
> The actual HTML5 spec is at
> <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html>.

> >> One thing to note that the current HTML5 specification
> >> has removed the "profile" attribute of the "head" element,


Item #5540 (14 Jan 2010 09:19) - Re: Dublin Core review of HTML5
From: Dan Brickley <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Dublin Core review of HTML5
Comments: To: Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>
>
>  https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?S2-GENERAL&q=html5
>
> The content of the note wasn’t specified exactly, but I think
> it was to invite review of HTML5.


> One thing to note that the current HTML5 specification
> has removed the “profile” attribute of the “head” element,


Item #5539 (13 Jan 2010 22:25) - Dublin Core review of HTML5
From: Larry Masinter <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Dublin Core review of HTML5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?S2-GENERAL&q=html5

The content of the note wasn't specified exactly, but I think
it was to invite review of HTML5.

One thing to note that the current HTML5 specification
has removed the "profile" attribute of the "head" element,


Item #5411 (5 Jan 2009 13:52) - Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
>
> I've seen a lot of discussion on W3C lists on HTML5 and RDFa, and I
> think there are many working on making that combination work.


Item #5410 (4 Jan 2009 19:47) - Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
> >
> > I've seen a lot of discussion on W3C lists on HTML5 and RDFa, and I
> > think there are many working on making that combination work.


Item #5405 (4 Jan 2009 12:16) - Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
>
> I've seen a lot of discussion on W3C lists on HTML5 and RDFa, and I
> think there are many working on making that combination work.


Item #5406 (4 Jan 2009 08:10) - SV: Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
>
> I've seen a lot of discussion on W3C lists on HTML5 and RDFa, and I
> think there are many working on making that combination work.


Item #5407 (4 Jan 2009 07:50) - Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML
>
> I've seen a lot of discussion on W3C lists on HTML5 and RDFa, and I
> think there are many working on making that combination work.


Item #5404 (3 Jan 2009 23:22) - Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML

I've seen a lot of discussion on W3C lists on HTML5 and RDFa, and I
think there are many working on making that combination work.



JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager