Thank you so much Petros On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 4:47 PM Koutsolampros, Petros < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Mona, > > I assume you're talking about the latest released version 0.6.0 and > importing a DXF. depthmapX can not handle curves so they are converted into > lines. If your curves are arcs then depthmap should break them into 36 > lines each. If your curves are splines then depthmap will just connect the > control points of each spline with lines. > > If you have splines and need a more accurate representation its better if > you somehow break it into lines in your CAD application and then import it. > > Cheers, > Petros > > On 24/11/2018 11:20, Mona Tarashi wrote: > > hello > I have another question > I imported a plan with some curves into depth map. those curves appear > like a direct line in the depth map, I want them to be like arcs, > what is the problem? do you know any solution? > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 5:12 PM Mona Tarashi <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Thank you Kerstin >> >> On Friday, October 19, 2018, Kerstin Sailer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mona, >>> >>> Just to follow up Alan's suggestion, I've written a blog post some years >>> ago highlighting that very point. You might find this useful: >>> https://spaceandorganisation.org/2015/03/13/seeing-is-not-interacting-thoughts-on-the-new-learning-hub-by-heatherwick-studio/ >>> >>> As Daniel suggests, there is of course a lot of research published, >>> particularly in the analysis of museums, so do take a look at that >>> literature too (google scholar is your friend here!) >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Kerstin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 19/10/2018 13:37, Penn, Alan wrote: >>> >>>> Mona, >>>> >>>> the simplest advice is that if you can think of two ways of doing an >>>> analysis you do both and compare the results. For example, the void cannot >>>> be walked across so treat it as a block for permeability, but it can be >>>> seen across so treat it as open space for visibility. The difference >>>> between these two analyses will tell you something about how the building >>>> works. >>>> >>>> Alan >>>> >>>> On 19 Oct 2018, at 12:59, Mona Tarashi <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear friends >>>>> Hello >>>>> >>>>> I have a problem in performing an analysis. we have void in a plan. >>>>> so we can see the first floor from the second floor, but we have no >>>>> direct access. ( just from staircases) >>>>> i want to perform axial analysis and VGA analysis, but i am not sure >>>>> it is correct not to consider void areas. >>>>> do you have any comments? or any similar project which i can see the >>>>> process? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 3:17 PM Jacob Dibble <[log in to unmask]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> Dear Kimon, Daniel, and Alan, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you all for the quick and thorough responses!! I am actually >>>>> going to hold off on any further responses to you because I want to look >>>>> more carefully at your answers, run a few different test, and revisit the >>>>> formulas used of course in conjunction with what you have said. Also, Kimon >>>>> I want to check out your publication and Daniel I would like to check out >>>>> the reference you sent me as well. >>>>> >>>>> I will come back when I have a chance to look more calmly at your very >>>>> thorough responses and go from there! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks again and hope everyone has a nice weekend, >>>>> Jacob >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dr. Jacob Leonard Dibble >>>>> >>>>> www.jacobdibble.com >>>>> >>>>> [log in to unmask] >>>>> +358 (0) 45 7877 9956 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:42 PM Krenz, Kimon-Vincent < >>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>> Dear Jacob, >>>>> >>>>> I assume your are running an angular segment analysis with metric >>>>> radius for integration and are using a road centre line map as your base?. >>>>> >>>>> I have discussed this issue a while ago with Petros Koutsolampros. The >>>>> conclusion is that these outliers are caused by three factors: >>>>> >>>>> a) the length of the segment, >>>>> b) the fact that segments are leaf segments (at the end or near the >>>>> end of a graph), and >>>>> c) the use of a tulip analysis (which divides the angular difference >>>>> into tulip bins). >>>>> >>>>> This means the analysis only reaches the segment only once and this >>>>> leads to high square values. Petros wrote a simple example based on an >>>>> analysis back then, which I will copy below: >>>>> >>>>> Taking the example of the outlier Ref: 6001. That segment is only >>>>> connected to one other segment (Ref: 5999) and because you limit by metric >>>>> radius 1200, you only capture that for the analysis from 6001. You can see >>>>> this if you do metric-step-depth: only 5999 is less than 1200. >>>>> >>>>> The actual angle between the two segments is 178.44057 degrees but >>>>> since you're using tulip analysis with 1024 bins this falls within the 4th >>>>> bin (1st bin is at 180 if I understand correctly), making thus their >>>>> angular distance = bin/(tulips / 4) = 1/64 (0.015625). Again you can see >>>>> this with angular step depth from 6001: 5999 has that value. >>>>> >>>>> As there's only one other segment, this is also the final total depth >>>>> from 6001 >>>>> >>>>> The final integration calculation is nodes*nodes/totalDepth = >>>>> 2*2/(1/64) = 256 (the two nodes are 6001 and 5999) >>>>> >>>>> As one can see, this is an expected outcome, at least from a >>>>> computational point of view. >>>>> >>>>> You might, nevertheless, want to remove these outliers from your map. >>>>> If so, you could have a look at the appendix (page 74.23) of my SSS12 paper >>>>> 'regional morphology', where I describe a method to identify these outlier >>>>> by dividing through the log of integration by the log total depth: >>>>> >>>>> CCTD_r = Log(CC_r+3)/Log(TD_r+3) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322255338_Regional_Morphology_The_Emergence_of_Spatial_Scales_in_Urban_Regions >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Kimon >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dr Kimon Krenz >>>>> FHEA >>>>> >>>>> mail. [log in to unmask] >>>>> phone. 0044 7784 329089 >>>>> web. www.kimonkrenz.com >>>>> >>>>> The Bartlett School of Architecture >>>>> Faculty of the Built Environment >>>>> University College London UCL >>>>> 22 Gordon Street >>>>> London WC1H 0QB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 19 Oct 2018, at 09:34, Jacob Dibble <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I had sent this query to the QGIS toolkit forum and Jorge advised me >>>>>> to instead ask on the general forum: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a question regarding Local Integration values on smaller >>>>>> radii. On low radii, on even higher (up to 800m) I am seeing in my >>>>>> particular case that the segments with the highest integration values are >>>>>> on the very very ends of the graph. The attached picture shows the 400m >>>>>> integration for segment analysis with metric radius type and only the top >>>>>> decile of highest values shown in red, with the base network underneath. >>>>>> For example one of the segments at the very edge of the graph has an >>>>>> integration value about 8 times higher than the next highest. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am looking for an explanation and some help to understand why some >>>>>> of the highest values are appearing at the ends of the graph, or in the >>>>>> middle of the arterial routes coming towards the city and even in the >>>>>> centre. These segments really only reach one or two segments within the >>>>>> 400m cutoff, so logically these should have very low integration, right? >>>>>> >>>>>> It would be nice to discuss perhaps why this is happening (both >>>>>> technically and perhaps from a perspective related to the urban structure) >>>>>> and also to know if there are any suggestions, workarounds, ways to redraw >>>>>> the graph, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>> Jacob Dibble >>>>>> >>>>>> <image.png> >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link: >>>>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link: >>>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link: >>>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Mona Tarashi. >>>>> Master of urban design >>>>> Tehran Art University >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link: >>>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ######################################################################## >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link: >>>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1 >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr Kerstin Sailer >>> Reader in Social and Spatial Networks >>> >>> Space Syntax Laboratory >>> The Bartlett School of Architecture >>> University College London (UCL) >>> 22 Gordon Street >>> London WC1H 0QB UK >>> >>> T: +44 (0) 20 3108 9031 >>> E: [log in to unmask] >>> W: www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/architecture/research/space-syntax-laboratory/ >>> W: www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/architecture/dr-kerstin-sailer >>> W: www.spaceandorganisation.org >>> T: www.twitter.com/kerstinsailer >>> >>> ######################################################################## >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link: >>> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1 >>> >> >> >> -- >> Mona Tarashi. >> Master of urban design >> Tehran Art University >> >> > > -- > Mona Tarashi. > Master of urban design > Tehran Art University > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1 > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1 > -- Mona Tarashi. Master of urban design Tehran Art University ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the SPACESYNTAX list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=SPACESYNTAX&A=1