Print

Print


Hi Saad,
Thank you for the explanation.
Now, everything is clearer for me!

Maurizio


>Hi Maurizio 
 
>The kurtosis model essentially interpolates your diffusivities (slope of log(signal) vs bvalue) to their value at b=0. This interpolation assumes that >the  log(signal) vs bvalue curve is a quadratic with a curvature that is controlled by an extra ‘kurtosis’ parameter.  
 
>In DTIFIT the --kurt option assumes a single kurtosis along all directions (as opposed to, e.g. a kurtosis tensor). However, it turns out this model >underestimates the ‘interpolated’ parallel diffusivity, which explains the lower FA value. One simple alternative is to have a parallel and a >perpendicular kurtosis (so two extra parameters compared to a standard tensor model) but this is not available in the released version of DTIFIT.   
 
>I hope this clarifies the issue. 
 
>Best wishes 
>Saad 
 
 
 
 
 
>> On 3 Nov 2018, at 16:21, Maurizio Bergamino <[log in to unmask]> wrote: 
>>  
>> Thanks Manuel, 
>> It is the same thing that I understood. 
>> But I did not expect to have big differences when I fitted the same DTI data by using two different procedures, with --kurt and without --kurt.  
>> FA difference between, for example, 0.72 and 0.42 in the same voxel, is big. 
>>  
>> Maurizio  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>> Hi Maurizio, 
>>>  
>>> If I understand correctly, when you activate the --kurt option, you are fitting the kurtosis model, that is more suitable for multishell data. The >>problem is if you want to compare with other FA values from literature, then probably you'd like to split the data and just use dtifit to one shell >>without the --kurt flag. I hope this helps. 
>>>  
>>> Best regards, 
>>>  
>>> Manuel 
>>>  
>  
>>>> Hello, 
>>>> It is the first time that I use a DTI multishell acquisition. My question is related to dtifit. 
>>>> When I use dtifit, do I have to use the option --kurt to fit my data? 
>>>> Because, I used dtifit with and without that option, and I had big differences in FA maps. 
>>>> For example, in the same voxel, I had FA=0.72 (without --kurt) and FA=0.42 (with --kurt). 
>  
>>>> Thanks, 
>>>> Maurizio 
>  
> ######################################################################## 
>  
> To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link: 
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1 
 
 
######################################################################## 
 
To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link: 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1 

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the FSL list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=FSL&A=1