 |
 |
No, and I think you'd get arguments about what the semantics of such operations would be. You can already define your own generic operators on arrays to mean whatever you'd like. Steve On 11/6/2018 8:48 AM, Vishnu V. Krishnan wrote: > A logical extension of the extremely convenient array syntax ... > > would be array-array operations of the kind: > > array3(1:d1*d2) = array1(1:d1) <operation> array2(1:d2) > > or maybe with a dimension upgrade, with some convention on the ordering, say > column ordered with the first array being the fastest changing index (because > we like that). > > Has anything like this been considered for the spec? > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the COMP-FORTRAN-90 list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=COMP-FORTRAN-90&A=1