 |
 |
In most cases I assume it will come down to giving the applicant the choice of providing information up front or imposing pre-commencement conditions? Would be good to hear other views and experiences on this. Thanks Robert *Robert TylerPrincipal Pollution Control Officer - Land, Air & Water* London Borough of Hackney Public Realm Neighbourhoods & Housing Directorate PO Box 70210 E8 9EJ Tel: 020 8356 4827 *For further information on Land, Water and Air issues see:* http://www.hackney.gov.uk/pollution-2.htm *Sign up to be warned of Medium and High Air Pollution Events in London: * http://www.hackney.gov.uk/airtext Disclaimers: 1. General Environmental Information: Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information and data provided within this correspondence, the Council accept no liability for any loss or damage howsoever caused arising from any reliance placed by any other person upon the information and data contained herein. 2. Relating to Planning (including London Legacy Development Corporation sites): The responsibility to properly address contaminated land issues, including safe development and secure occupancy, and irrespective of any involvement by this Authority, lies with the owner/developer of the site. On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 08:04, Ciara Longman < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi everyone > > > > From our Planning Manager “As of 1 October, the government are enacting > some significant changes to the way we issue decisions. One of the key > changes relates to pre-commencement conditions. *These will no longer be > permitted* unless they have first been agreed by the applicant, and all > applicants are given 10 working days to comment on any proposed > pre-commencement conditions. Where they object to the condition, we are not > allowed to impose that condition. The key impact of this on yourselves as > consultees is that we will no longer be able to impose pre-commencement > conditions because we don't have relevant information. They will only be > used where absolutely necessary. Therefore, can I please request that you > review your comments on applications to remove pre-commencement condition > requests where necessary, and that where they are likely to be required > that we get your comments as early as possible to allow the officer to > complete the necessary notices.” > > > > Worst case scenario this completely contradicts the outcome of Leeds vs > Technoprint, ahem. > > > > Upadate local requirements for Planning Validation policy and this > information must be submitted on validation? I know a few LAs already do > this but the majority don’t. So if a desk top/SI hasn’t been submitted on > validation then we object? > > > > What are other LAs doing? > > > > Cheers > > Ciara > > > > > > *Ciara Longman | Land Quality Officer* > > Community Enforcement Services > > Pink Zone, Civic Centre > > London Borough of Hounslow > > Office: 020 8583 4532 > > www.hounslow.gov.uk > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES list, click the > following link: > > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES&A=1 > Disclaimers apply, for full details see: https://hackney.gov.uk/email-disclaimer ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES&A=1