 |
 |
Weekend FSC spar 2.0? On Sep 7, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Chiara Rapisarda <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: Dear community members, I would like to know what is the state of the art for reporting negative stain reconstruction resolution. Is it best to not include it or to use the 0.5 FSC cut off. I definitely don't want to use the 0.143 cut-off, but I thought that it is important to give an idea of the quality of the reconstruciton by using some form of quantitative measure. Is there an agreement on what to do? Thank you for any feedback I will receive. Chiara Rapisarda Post doc Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Tel. +33 (5) 4000 3617 Institut européen de chimie et biologie 2, rue Robert Escarpit 33607 Pessac, France www.iecb.u-bordeaux.fr<http://www.iecb.u-bordeaux.fr> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the CCPEM list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCPEM list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCPEM&A=1