 |
 |
Here is the NY times article that is talked about: https://www.nytimes. com/2018/08/04/opinion/sunday/anti-vaccine-activists-have- taken-vaccine-science-hostage.html?action=click I often feel that single studies should refrain from making any recommendations. Only a systematic review or met-analysis which looks at multiple studies (evidence in totality) assessing the study quality and such should make explicit recommendations. On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Vaccine censorship. Vaccines taboo. "Who benefits from the crime"? That > is to say, who benefits from this censorship?. These are the key opinion > leaders and the pharmaceutical industry. > Auto-censura con vacunas. El tabú que impide el debate científico. ¿Quién > se beneficia? La industria y sus expertos. > https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1026055906281312256.html?refreshed=yes > -un saludo juan gérvas @JuanGrvas > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH list, click the following > link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1= > EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH&A=1