Print

Print


medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

Hi Genevra,

Thanks for having a look. You're quite right, of course. I saw some long 
index fingers (particularly Lady Bertilak's) and got excited, but 
looking at the other illustrations, I see what you're saying. 
Intentional crossed fingers would be much more obvious.

At least I have that votive hand!

Steve


On 7/23/2018 12:57 PM, Genevra Kornbluth wrote:
> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
> Steve, I think that you are asking more of the MS image than it has to 
> give. The hands are never very sharply defined. Still, look at the 
> other hands in the same manuscript, as nicely illustrated in the 
> McGillivray and Duffy link. The index finger is indeed normally longer 
> than the other fingers on any hand, supporting the interpretation of 
> finger crossing on your folio, where it is shorter. But look at other 
> hands in figs. 5-6 and 16-18 (where Arthur also appears to have one 
> finger of his left hand bent behind another). You always need to 
> establish the immediate context before interpreting a visual image, 
> just as you would for a textual one.
> In any case, thanks for an interesting thread!
> best,
> Genevra
>
> On 7/23/2018 10:44 AM, Stephen Barker wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>> All that's interesting enough, but my question is about the 
>> illustration (it's on the truce-term Wikipedia page or in higher 
>> definition 
>> <http://contentdm.ucalgary.ca/digital/collection/gawain/id/289/rec/108> 
>> at the University of Calgary). Does the illustration of Gawain 
>> claiming the right to take on the green knight show him with crossed 
>> fingers? He's upper left in red with an axe and a raised hand, 
>> opposite Arthur and co. It looks to me like his index finger is 
>> hiding a bit behind his middle finger, but it could be my wishful 
>> thinking. They look more obviously crossed in this infrared version 
>> <https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/na101/home/literatum/publisher/uchicago/journals/content/spc/2017/spc.2017.92.issue-s1/693361/20171002/images/large/fg18.jpeg> 
>> from Murray McGillivray and Christina Duffy, "New Light on the /Sir 
>> Gawain and the Green Knight/ Manuscript: Multispectral Imaging and 
>> the Cotton Nero A.x. Illustrations 
>> <https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/693361#> (2017)." 
>> [no pay-walls on any of these links]
>>
>> All best,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
> ********************************************************************** 
> To join the list, send the message: subscribe medieval-religion YOUR 
> NAME to: [log in to unmask] To send a message to the list, 
> address it to: [log in to unmask] To leave the list, 
> send the message: unsubscribe medieval-religion to: 
> [log in to unmask] In order to report problems or to contact the 
> list's owners, write to: [log in to unmask] For 
> further information, visit our web site: 
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/medieval-religion 


**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: subscribe medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: unsubscribe medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/medieval-religion