Print

Print


We have used SEM analysis in conjunction with the below methods, to achieve a higher LOD and more information on the type of asbestos.

Michael Moore P
Senior Officer (Environment)
Public Protection

[cid:image001.png@01D4136D.1521D9D0]

[Phone] 01706 924107<tel:+441706924107>
[Mobile] 07976 059366<tel:+447976059366>
[Mail] [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Rochdale Borough Council
Floor 3, Number One Riverside
Smith Street, Rochdale, OL16 1XU

To access our services go to www.rochdale.gov.uk<http://www.rochdale.gov.uk/>
For news and social media updates go to www.rochdale.gov.uk/news<http://www.rochdale.gov.uk/news/>

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ben Jones
Sent: 03 July 2018 17:40
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Asbestos Quantification

Good morning all,

We have recently been looking at asbestos analysis and quantification, and I thought I would ask for opinions from the group.

My understanding is commercial laboratories generally offer quantification using the following techniques (please correct me if I am wrong):

·         Gravimetric – sample is visually inspected for ACMs, when encountered they are segregated and weighed;

·         Detailed gravimetric – inspection of sample under a microscope, following by picking and weighing of ACM/fibre bundles within samples;

·         PCOM quantification – an aqueous suspension is prepared and filtered, fibres counted and sized using PCOM.

I have generally found that the PCOM stage does not find free fibres in excess of the laboratories limit of reporting (<0.001%), although not always. The sub sample aliquot is also very small (a few grams grams). It is my understanding the PCOM stage was developed assuming asbestos is uniformly distributed throughout a soil, which is hardly ever the case. Having spoken to a few analysts, the general feeling is provided the gravimetric stage is done thoroughly, this is usually sufficient to quantify the asbestos within sample, as asbestos fibres tend to be present in relatively large fibre bundles that can be picked out. Does the PCOM stage therefore add any value to risk assessment/waste classification etc.?

Would it be better for the lab budget to be used for more asbestos screens/quantifications rather than fewer samples using the more detailed quantification method? Or does the more detailed quantification method provide the necessary detail required to inform accurate assessment of asbestos content of the soil?

Kind Regards

Ben

[cid:image005.jpg@01D4136D.1521D9D0]
Ben Jones

Associate - Land Quality & Remediation

-



[cid:image006.png@01D4136D.1521D9D0]

  +44 1225 309400

[cid:image007.png@01D4136D.1521D9D0]

  +44 7464 498619

[cid:image008.png@01D4136D.1521D9D0]

  [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

-



SLR Consulting Limited

Treenwood House, Rowden Lane, Bradford on Avon, BA15 2AU

-




[cid:image010.png@01D4136D.1521D9D0]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/65406/> [cid:image011.png@01D4136D.1521D9D0] <https://twitter.com/slrenvironment>  [cid:image012.jpg@01D4136D.1521D9D0] <http://>  [cid:image013.png@01D4136D.1521D9D0] <http://slrconsulting.com/news/2016/slr-wins-environment-analysts-international-business-excellence-award-2016>




Confidentiality Notice and Limitation
This communication, and any attachment(s) contains information which is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or not taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please advise SLR by e-mail and then delete the e-mail from your system. As e-mails and any information sent with them may be intercepted, corrupted and/or delayed, SLR does not accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the message or any attachment howsoever caused after transmission.

Any advice or opinion is provided on the basis that it has been prepared by SLR with reasonable skill, care and diligence, taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with its Client. It is subject to the terms and conditions of any appointment to which it relates. Parties with whom SLR is not in a contractual relationship in relation to the subject of the message should not use or place reliance on any information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this message and any attachment(s) for any purpose.

© 2017 SLR Consulting Limited. All Rights Reserved.






EUMBX1S

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES&A=1

This email, its contents and any attachments are intended only for the above named. As the email may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information, if you are not, or suspect that you are not, the above named or the person responsible for delivery of the message to the above named, please delete or destroy the email and any attachments immediately and inform the sender of the error. Unauthorised access, use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted and may be unlawful.  The views of the author may not necessarily reflect those of Rochdale Borough Council.

Rochdale Borough Council undertakes monitoring of both incoming and outgoing e-mails. You should therefore be aware that if you send an e-mail to a person within Rochdale Borough Council it may be subject to any monitoring deemed necessary by Rochdale Borough Council from time to time. Rochdale Borough Council cannot guarantee that this message or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted and amended.

As a public body, Rochdale Borough Council may be required to disclose this email (or any response to it) under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions within the Act.

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES&A=1