Print

Print


OK, John, I'll 'bite'.  I really must find out more about Donald 
Mackenzie.  I mean, how nutty can you get - unless he was being 
exceptionally prescient, and forecasting rising sea levels over a 
century before we started to get all het up about melting ice caps, 
global waming and rising sea levels. But we're still only talking abour 
rising sea levels of centimetres, and Timbuktu  lies at an elevation of 
261 metres. But, to be fair, the Suez Canal, dug through more-or-less 
similar desert is 100-odd miles long - and in Britain we were about to 
make  Manchester accessible to deep-sea ships (opened 1894), so why 
shouldn't Victorian engineers dig a canal 2, 3 or 400 miles long?   In 
all seriousness, it's one of the things I admire about our Victorian 
forebears - their total conviction that their technology could master 
any problem which it faced.  But assuming that a canal to Timbuktu would 
have been a steady rise, from sea-level to 262 metres, I'm not sure 
where he was going to get the water from, to keep his summit level 
supplied with water.
     As regards the lunatic line, I suspect that bit of doggerel 
post-dates any interest Kipling might have had when the tale was written 
in 1889 - I mean, British 'official' invlovement with Kenya only started 
in 1888, a scant year before Kipling wrote the tale which started this off.
     But it's fun.
/Alastair Wilson/
On 23/06/2018 22:40, John Walker wrote:
> Dear Leslie,
>
> Donald Mackenzie was the man who invented Port Victoria. He was going 
> to flood the Sahara, so that ships could sail to Timbuktu.
>
> (That last sentence should get someone else to chip in to this 
> discussion).
>
> And the railway buffs should be eager to tell you about the Uganda 
> Railway:
>
> What is the use of it, none can conjecture,
> What it will carry, there is none can define,
> And in spite ofGeorge Curzon 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Curzon,_1st_Marquess_Curzon_of_Kedleston>'s 
> superior lecture,
> It is clearly naught but a lunatic line.
>
> There is bound to be much Wiki on this.
>
> AGW,
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mailtrack 
> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&> 
> 	Sender notified by
> Mailtrack 
> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&> 
> 06/23/18, 10:39:09 PM 	
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 10:16 PM Leslie Katz <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>     Many thanks for taking the trouble to reply John.
>
>     On 2018-06-23 03:52 PM, John Walker wrote:
>>     Dear Leslie,
>>
>>     Like you, I had always associated Nyanza Docks with Port Florence.
>     "Always" is a bit of stretch in my case--I'd never heard of either
>     as recently as twelve hours ago!
>>     We are not talking about a great trading place here, any more
>>     than Charing Cross, but simply the kind of spot where you can
>>     'wait at the Nyzana Docks till he comes'... oddly enough, someone
>>     recently, talking about a new freeport at Kisumu used the modern
>>     phrase; a 'logistic hub'.... with a new rail link.
>>
>>     Then, of course, your note set me to wondering whether the/local
>>     /name for a Dock in Woolwich was being used, but the street John
>>     mentions is a very long way across Plumsted Common from the water.
>>
>>     So, I was still thinking Port Florence fits, if you allow for the
>>     closeness of Port Victoria, which had a classical position as the
>>     end point for some caravan routes.
>     But not, as far as I can tell, the end point of a railway, which
>     Collins associated with the place in his article.
>>
>>     And, by chance, I came across the 'Victoria Nyanza' link, on old
>>     Admiralty charts, and even as the name of a trading vessel.
>>
>>     https://collections.slsa.sa.gov.au/resource/PRG+1373/8/76
>>
>>     So now my vote is for Port Victoria, with a nod to Mackenzie.
>     I'm sorry, but I don't understand the reference to Mackenzie.
>
>     I know this is revealing my almost complete ignorance about
>     Kipling, but I'm not aware that he was ever in Kenya. If he
>     wasn't, I wonder how he came to think of mentioning some docks
>     there as one of the great doors of the world, along with Charing
>     Cross Station and (effectively) Port Said.
>
>     Thank you again,
>
>     Leslie
>
>
>>
>>     All the best,
>>
>>     John
>>
>>
>>
>>     .
>>
>>
>>     Mailtrack
>>     <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&>
>>     	Sender notified by
>>     Mailtrack
>>     <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&>
>>     06/23/18, 9:41:19 PM 	
>>
>>
>>     On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 6:31 PM Leslie Katz <[log in to unmask]
>>     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>>         In "The Limitations of Pambe Serang", Kipling identified
>>         "three great doors in the world where, if you stand long
>>         enough, you shall meet any one you wish." One of those doors
>>         was said to be "the Nyanza Docks".
>>
>>         At http://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/rg_limitspambe_notes.htm,
>>         I found the following note: "Nyanza Docks there are no docks
>>         of this name in London, but there is a Nyanza Street in
>>         Woolwich, London S.E.18."
>>
>>         JP Collins, in an article in (1939) 7 Kipling Journal 8,
>>         locates "the Nyanza Docks" in Africa and says that it links a
>>         water route with a railway.
>>
>>         On the shores of Lake Victoria, there's the city of Kisumu,
>>         Kenya (formerly Port Florence). It has a rail link to
>>         Mombasa, Kenya, which is on the ocean.
>>
>>         According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyanza, nyanza is
>>         the Bantu word for lake, including Victoria Nyanza (Lake
>>         Victoria).
>>
>>         Doing the best I can, I'm guessing that the Nyanza Docks to
>>         which Kipling was referring were in Port Florence.
>>
>>         Since I know nothing about Kipling, I could well have this
>>         all wrong.
>>
>>         I'd appreciate any guidance.
>>
>>         Leslie
>>
>>         ########################################################################
>>
>>         To unsubscribe from the RUDYARD-KIPLING list, click the
>>         following link:
>>         https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=RUDYARD-KIPLING&A=1
>>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Leslie Katz
>
>     email: lesliek [at] mymts [dot] net
>
>     Please visit http://ssrn.com/author=1164057 to find hyperlinks
>
>     to papers that I’ve written on literary and legal topics
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the RUDYARD-KIPLING list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=RUDYARD-KIPLING&A=1
>


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the RUDYARD-KIPLING list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=RUDYARD-KIPLING&A=1