 |
 |
Thank you Anderson! On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Anderson M. Winkler <[log in to unmask] > wrote: > Hi Chirag, > > C3 will show neither the union or the intersection. Instead, it will show > whether the average of the two is significant after their difference has > been taken into account as nuisance. > > All the best, > > Anderson > > > On 3 August 2017 at 17:28, Chirag Limbachia <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> FSL Experts, >> >> In our event-related design, we had two stimulus types. Type one was >> modeled with EV1 and type two was modeled with EV2. My contrast setup was >> as following, >> >> C1: [1 0] >> C2: [0 1] >> C3: [1 1] >> >> And I am sure there are several ways of setting up the contrast. My main >> question is, what regions will show activation for C3? >> >> Will it give OR (union) of regions that show activation to either or both >> of the EVs? >> >> OR >> >> Will it give AND (intersection) of regions that show activation to both >> EVs? >> >> Thank you >> Chirag >> > >