Print

Print


Hi Silvano,

Would you mind in sending your input data, design, full command line, and
version used? You can put in some file sharing service and send the link
off-list. Happy to have a look in a few days.

Thanks!

All the best,

Anderson


On 20 August 2017 at 07:24, Silvano Sele <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear PALM experts
>
> I run an analysis in PALM corrected over all 8 contrasts and was surprised
> by the large change of the p-values.  I have a 2 (between)*3(within
> design). I used a design for the 6 interactions (3*2 (onesided)) and a
> design for the between group contrast(also onesided both directions)
> according to a design i found in the mailinglist (using -ee -ise -within
> -whole).The minimum p-value i got in a between group contrast  (in logp)
> using TFCE changed from 2.98 (tfce_tstat_fwep) to 1.02(tfce_tstat_cfwep).
> The minimum voxelwise p-value only changed from 2.43 (vox_tstat_fwep) to
> 1.91 (vox_stat_cfwep) in this contrast. I was expecting at maximum a change
> in p-values times 8 and I'm now not sure how to interpret the tfce
> cfwe-p-values and if I should correct the main effect of group for these
> interactions.
>
> Thank you very much for the help.
>
> Best wishes
> Silvano
>