Hi Silvano,

Would you mind in sending your input data, design, full command line, and
version used? You can put in some file sharing service and send the link
off-list. Happy to have a look in a few days.


All the best,


On 20 August 2017 at 07:24, Silvano Sele <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear PALM experts
> I run an analysis in PALM corrected over all 8 contrasts and was surprised
> by the large change of the p-values.  I have a 2 (between)*3(within
> design). I used a design for the 6 interactions (3*2 (onesided)) and a
> design for the between group contrast(also onesided both directions)
> according to a design i found in the mailinglist (using -ee -ise -within
> -whole).The minimum p-value i got in a between group contrast  (in logp)
> using TFCE changed from 2.98 (tfce_tstat_fwep) to 1.02(tfce_tstat_cfwep).
> The minimum voxelwise p-value only changed from 2.43 (vox_tstat_fwep) to
> 1.91 (vox_stat_cfwep) in this contrast. I was expecting at maximum a change
> in p-values times 8 and I'm now not sure how to interpret the tfce
> cfwe-p-values and if I should correct the main effect of group for these
> interactions.
> Thank you very much for the help.
> Best wishes
> Silvano