Thanks for your comments.
Gerard, apologies for the rogue link to the UCL-only space – most of this work is happening a members-only wiki, so I copied the page over to my own space to show it (Confluence permissions
are weird). I’ll be aiming to keep the page up to date.
So far we have listed WebPA, CATME, TEAMMATES and a bespoke approach using Moodle Questionnaire. There used to be a platform called CASPAR (https://www.cemp.ac.uk/tools/caspar.php)
but it seems to be dormant. I’m very grateful for the leads to iPeer (thanks Kar-On) and to SparkPlus (thanks Claire).
From: WebPA [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Claire Leer
Sent: 05 June 2017 15:34
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Comparison of WebPA to other peer assessment platforms
this is very a useful resource. Have you also looked at SPARKPlus? The benefit this tool has over others is that students can write feedback to their peers which is anonymous. So students don't just receive a score but written feedback too which is very valuable
as part of their learning and development journey.
Senior Lecturer in Events Management and Tourism
Programme Leader BA Events Management
Faculty of Business and Law
DDI: +44 (0)1604 893510
A few of us have been comparing WebPA, CATME, and Teammates (CASPAR seems to be retired) as part of a wider project on peer assessment of individual contribution.
I’ve made a public copy of the comparison page at
https://wiki.ucl.ac.uk/x/aQEVB - it’s not complete but is fairly well developed, especially with respect to WebPA.
I’d welcome comments (and any corrections) and hope this is helpful.
Dr Mira Vogel SFHEA | Digital Education Advisor, Digital Education, ISD, University College London | 020 3549 5197 (x65197) | Visiting details: