Thank you John Paul – I’m a huge fan of WebPA too. I look forward to watching your Team Evaluation talk.
From: WebPA [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Paul Posada
Sent: 07 June 2017 01:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Comparison of WebPA to other peer assessment platforms
I’ve had WebPA implemented and integrated into Moodle for a number of years now, but have just released a beta version of a plugin we call Team Evaluation that functions directly with team work activities within Moodle. We’ve basically
built on the great work of the WebPA community to fully integrate similar capabilities within Moodle, the main LMS here at UNSW.
You can see a talk we gave on this at MoodleMoot 2016 here:
The plugin can be found here:
As I mentioned this is still in beta, but we do plan to continue it’s development.
John Paul Posada
Educational Technologist, UNSW Engineering
UNSW Sydney NSW 2052 AUSTRALIA
T: +61 (2) 9385 6123
M: +61 401 713 540
E: [log in to unmask]
CRICOS Provider No: 00098G
Thanks for your comments.
Gerard, apologies for the rogue link to the UCL-only space – most of this work is happening a members-only wiki, so I copied the page over to my own space to
show it (Confluence permissions are weird). I’ll be aiming to keep the page up to date.
So far we have listed WebPA, CATME, TEAMMATES and a bespoke approach using Moodle Questionnaire. There used to be a platform called CASPAR (https://www.cemp.ac.uk/tools/caspar.php)
but it seems to be dormant. I’m very grateful for the leads to iPeer (thanks Kar-On) and to SparkPlus (thanks Claire).
this is very a useful resource. Have you also looked at SPARKPlus? The benefit this tool has over others is that students can write feedback to their peers which is anonymous. So students don't just receive a score but written feedback too which is very valuable
as part of their learning and development journey.
Senior Lecturer in Events Management and Tourism
Programme Leader BA Events Management
Faculty of Business and Law
DDI: +44 (0)1604 893510
A few of us have been comparing WebPA, CATME, and Teammates (CASPAR seems to be retired) as part of a wider project on peer assessment of individual contribution.
I’ve made a public copy of the comparison page at https://wiki.ucl.ac.uk/x/aQEVB -
it’s not complete but is fairly well developed, especially with respect to WebPA.
I’d welcome comments (and any corrections) and hope this is helpful.