I agree with your comments, Jason, the only thing I would challenge ( or encourage you to challenge with your academics) is that sessional examinations can
be used to stop cheating. There is increasing evidence of the use of increasingly sophisticated and small mobile devices in examination halls. Your excellent mathematician could be just a snapchat away!
From: Online forum for SEDA, the Staff & Educational Development Association
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jason Davies
Sent: 18 May 2017 11:22
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Non-essay based plagiarism
Hello Alice, and list
I can pass on some anecdotal stuff from Maths and similar which has been mentioned to me occasionally: plagiarism is often undifferentiable from collusion, and is only really detectable when mistakes are made
during the working-out because those are more identifiable and therefore suspicious.
This has the effect of meaning that the only logical way to cheat is to do it really well, which means students have to work out how to do the maths properly -- maths which they're already struggling with (you
see the paradox). Off the record, I've been told that just as essay subjects worry about essay mills being undetectable, they sometimes worry that clusters of almost perfect marks in coursework may indicate a social group with one or two excellent mathematicians
happy to help others rather than a group of independently excellent mathematicians. But they shrug and say this is why they retain exams alongside coursework, and why the majority of the assessment should remain exam-based.
Looking forward to seeing your results, though. I'll ask around in relevant disciplines to see if I can get any more bits and pieces.
Cheers
J
--
Dr Jason P Davies
Interim Director,
UCL Arena
UCL Arena Centre for Research-Based Education (formerly CALT)
10th Floor, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB
@JasonPtrDavies
Visit the
UCL Teaching and Learning Portal
On 18 May 2017, at 10:48, Alice Lau wrote:
Dear colleagues,
We are currently doing some work with our colleagues in our Quality Unit dealing with Plagiarism, and were asked about support and advice on how to prevent, detect, identify and deal with non-essay based plagiarism. We have looked at some existing research and guidance but most seems to focus on essays/written work.
Could anyone direct me to any relevant research/existing guidance on non-essay based plagiarism please?
Thank you all and will summarise and feedback to the group if people are interested!
Best wishes
Alice
Dr Alice Lau (FHEA)
Senior Lecturer – Academic Development
Group Organisational Development
Coventry University
Portal House, New Union StreetCoventry, CV1 2PL
UK’s top new university
Source: The Complete University Guide 2018Top 4 for Student Experience and Teaching Quality
Source: The Times and The Sunday Times Good University Guide 2017
NOTICE
This message and any files transmitted with it is intended for the addressee only and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. Unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you are not the addressee, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee.
Any views or opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Coventry University.
Generation TEF: Teaching in the spotlight
4-6 July 2017, Renold Building, Manchester
The returning HEA Annual Conference will take place over three days in July. More than 400 sessions are scheduled to provide attendees with the chance to share ideas, research, good practice and innovations with peers from across the sector peers to find out
whether the challenges and solutions from other disciplines could inspire innovation in individual and institutional practice.
To view the programme and book your ticket
click here.
The HEA welcomes UUK/GuildHE Bell Review Group recommendations on the future for Sector Agencies. For the latest HEA update on the Sector Agency review, click here.