Print

Print


please use the function „Display surface results“ as mentioned in 
the „quick start guide“. This function also allows to use atlas 
information.

best,

Christian

________________________________________

Christian Gaser, Ph.D.
Professor of Computational Neuroscience/Neuroimaging
Biomagnetic Center
Structural Brain Mapping Group
Department of Neurology
Jena University Hospital
Am Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
Tel: ++49-3641-9325778 Fax:   ++49-3641-9325772
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
http://www.neuro.uni-jena.de
On 7 Feb 2017, at 18:59, Dev vasu wrote:

> Dear Sir,
>
> Is there any way to check the MNI coordinates of ROI where i can see
> statistical significance ( see the figure attachment ) , also could 
> you
> please let me know which atlas i have to use for overlay .
>
> Thanks
> Vasudev
>
> On 6 February 2017 at 19:40, Christian Gaser 
> <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Vasudev,
>>
>> if you want to analyze the results of a 2-sample T-test you can only
>> select one contrast at each time. You have selected two opposite 
>> contrast
>> (A>B & B>A) as conjunction (where are both contrast significant). 
>> This will
>> never result in any finding.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Christian
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Christian Gaser, Ph.D.
>> Professor of Computational Neuroscience/Neuroimaging
>> Biomagnetic Center
>> Structural Brain Mapping Group
>> Department of Neurology
>> Jena University Hospital
>> Am Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
>> Tel: ++49-3641-9325778 <+49%203641%209325778> Fax: ++49-3641-9325772
>> <+49%203641%209325772>
>> e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>> http://www.neuro.uni-jena.de
>>
>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 16:59, Dev vasu wrote:
>>
>> Dear Sir,
>>
>> I have modelled SBM analysis as described CAT 12 manual and when i 
>> thought
>> of checking the results of group level study with 2 sample T test 
>> between 2
>> groups, i am unable to obtain any statistical outputs at cluster 
>> level. I
>> am attaching the figure for your notice, kindly let me know where i 
>> made a
>> mistake in my SBM analysis .
>>
>> Thanks
>> vasudev
>>
>>