Dear friends and colleagues, You might be interested by the (here attached) vision of the president of the French CNRS about what science can bring to: "fighting (the phenomena which lead to Paris killings) while avoiding blindness specific to terrors and its promoters". All the best, 2015-11-18 13:03 GMT+01:00 Paul Bourgine <[log in to unmask]>: > Dear Wander, dear all, > > I am also supporting the argument of Mario with Ozge. Our democraties were > not at all perfect inside as well as outside, internally and historically. > Humans needs more justice inside each country as well as internationally > between countries, in one word "at all levels". In this direction it is > possible to complete the first sentence: > > *A flourishing global culture requires tolerance and the embracing of >> diversity as important principles. -> **A flourishing global culture >> requires **at all levels** tolerance, equity of chance, justice and the >> embracing of diversity as the most important principles* >> > > I am happy to support the statement, independently of any rewriting. > > Best regards, > Paul > > Le 18 nov. 2015 à 11:23, Tabitha Kabora <[log in to unmask] > <[log in to unmask]>> a écrit : > > Dear all, > > I wholeheartedly support the statement on behalf of our community and will > share it with others on social media. The discussions brought up here > highlight the need to assess the root causes of these forms of > radicalization and violence and I look forward to working to bridge this > knowledge gap and enhance our understanding for the benefit of humanity. > > Regards, > Tabitha Kabora. > > On 18 November 2015 at 06:57, Kai Neumann <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Nastaran >> >> Isn't that what I have started with the collaborative qualitative cause >> and effect models I have shared earlier? >> As this challenge is defined by many variables I find it hard to think of >> an ABM to tackle it, isn't it? >> >> Best >> >> Kai >> >> Kai Neumann >> I model - therefore iM (www.iMODELER.net <http://www.imodeler.net/>) >> [log in to unmask] >> Tel: 0700 524 6386266 >> Skype: emmasilsa >> (from a mobile device - in case there are mistakes in my text ...;-) >> >> >> On Nov 18, 2015, at 4:57 AM, Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi < >> [log in to unmask] >> <[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Dear All, >> Thanks a lot for the initiative. I believe scientists, specially systems >> scientist should contribute more in solving social complex issues. >> I would like, as complexity concepts suggest, considering multiple agents >> of the system which produces and support terrorist systems. It would be >> very simplistic to think, ISIS is a religious system! I think it is rather >> a political party produced by politicians for political and economical >> goals. Let’s not forget, religions always have been and will be strong >> weapons in hands of those in power! >> I would like to raise some questions: >> How this horrible group funds itself? Who buys their oil? Who supports >> them? Which countries train them? Why they can still sell oil? Which bank >> they invest in? What technology they use to advertise themselves? Is it >> believable that intelligent agencies fail to find them or stop them!!!! >> Also we should think why people may join them? What is the role of poverty >> , low literacy, and social isolation as well as mental and emotional >> disorders? >> These are all agents and networks which should be considered. As long as >> these groups serve few countries and their politicians, normal people >> should pay. Wars in oil rich countries, religious conflicts and fear of >> terrorist attacks can make money for Weapon industry, can make it >> possible to buy illegal oil cheap, can change power systems and etc, it is >> very complex! That is the way I see that. >> According complexity concepts, I think good flow of accurate >> information about beyond the scene of this group, and also sharing in >> common and true values of all religions can help significantly.Can we do >> any thing in this regard? >> I wish peace and love for all >> Best Regards >> Nastaran >> ................................ >> Dr Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi >> PhD, Health Promotion >> >> Editorial Board Member, Health Promotion International >> >> School of Public Health >> Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences >> >> Skype ID: nastaran.keshavarz >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:02 PM, Emile Chappin - TBM < >> [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> >> Dear Wander, >> Wholeheartedly support your statement! >> Cheers, Emile >> >> --- >> Dr.ir. Émile J.L. Chappin >> Assistant professor, Delft University of Technology >> <http://www.eeni.tbm.tudelft.nl/> >> Senior research fellow, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and >> Energy <http://wupperinst.org/> >> [log in to unmask], http://chappin.com/emile >> Mobile: +31 61 787 6731 >> >> *Delft:* >> Visiting Address: Room a3.300, Jaffalaan 5, Delft, the Netherlands >> Postal Address: P.O. Box 5015, 2600 GA, Delft, the Netherlands >> Office: +31 15 278 3410, Fax: +31 15 278 3422 >> >> *Wuppertal:* >> Visiting Address: Room 5.19, Döppersberg 19, 42103 Wuppertal, Germany >> Office: +49 2022 492 312, Fax: +49 202 2492 198 >> >> *From:* News and discussion about computer simulation in the social >> sciences [mailto:[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Jager, Wander >> *Sent:* 14 November 2015 20:00 >> *To:* [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> >> *Subject:* [SIMSOC] Statement on behalf of our community on the Paris >> attacks >> >> Dear friends >> >> Usually we publish our ideas in scientific journals, but considering the >> impact of the terrorist attacks on innocent citizens on our society, the >> attack on Paris as the most recent gruesome act, I think that we, being >> scientists addressing the dynamics of society, have a responsibility to >> address the general public more directly. A polarisation of society, >> resulting in conflict, seems to be the aim of these fear-inducing attacks. >> The more society at large is aware of this likely aim, the more a liberal >> and tolerant culture might be resilient to such attacks. >> >> I propose publishing a statement on behalf of our scientific community. >> The following tekst is a sightly adapted post I made on Facebook. It might >> serve as a start for a joint message, which should have tolerance >> and openness as key values for a global culture to strive for. >> >> *A flourishing global culture requires tolerance and the embracing of >> diversity as important principles. The IS attacks on innocent citizens >> appear to be aimed at undermining this tolerant culture by fuelling a >> polarisation process, setting up groups of people against each other. >> Rather than responding with violence, leading to a spiralling down to a >> repressive state, as scientists we believe that we should support critical >> thinking in areas dominated by dogmatic and repressive powers. We prefer >> drones offering internet access over drones packed with with explosives. >> Better a bombardment with laptops than with rockets. Mind that lead is >> better used for printing than for bullets!* >> >> If you support this message just let me know, and if you have some >> suggestions for improving the tekst and for bringing this message out your >> input is valued very much. >> >> I hope to share a final tekst on Monday, which I want to circulate on >> this list. >> >> Warm regards from concerned citizen. >> >> Wander Jager >> >> >> -- >> Groningen Center for Social Complexity Studies >> University College Groningen >> Phone +31 (0)6 361 84 622 >> Twitter: @GCSCS_RuG >> Facebook: Groningen Center for Social Complexity Studies >> >> >> > > -- Gérard Weisbuch Laboratoire de Physique Statistique ENS 24 rue Lhomond 75005 Paris France http://www.lps.ens.fr/~weisbuch