Hi Anderson,

Thank you so much for your suggestion. When I try and create the contrast file from that matrix (1, -1), it interprets it as NumWaves 2 and NumPoints 1. Is there some simple way so that it defines the contrast the other way?

Thank you so much,

CN 

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Anderson M. Winkler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi Corey,

Can't say without seeing what you are doing, but in any case, with a single EV, you can create the design.mat by hand. It's a text file that looks like this:

/NumWaves 1

/NumPoints 100

/Matrix

xx

xx

xx

xx

xx

...

Where the "xx" are the numerical values you have for the EV. The design.con follows a similar structure:

/NumWaves 1

/NumPoints 2

/Matrix

1

-1

When running randomise, include the option -D.

All the best,

Anderson

On 24 September 2015 at 16:38, Corey N <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Dear FSl Experts,

I am hoping to run a one sample t-test using GLM to find correlations between FA values and a behavioral measure. Since all of my subjects are in a single group, my design matrix is simply the behavioral value. Is that correct?

Because I am working with 100 subjects, I used Text2Vest to convert my contrast matrix. I tried to do the same for the design matrix (1) since theres only 1 ev but get a expr: division by zero.

Am I setting up my GLM correctly? And if so, what is my mistake with Text2Vest?

Thank you so much
CN