Oseltamivir, zanamivir: inútiles. Antivirales en gripe, sin fundamento. "Tools for practice", Alberta (Canadá). Vía @rincondesisifo <https://twitter.com/rincondesisifo> *Oseltamivir, zanamivir: useless. Antivirals for flu without evidence. Tools for practice, from Alberta (Canada).* http://www.acfp.ca/wp-content/uploads/tools-for-practice/1422996262_tfp131anti-viralsfv2a2.pdf But see The Lancet *Oseltamivir in adults with influenza accelerates time to clinical symptom alleviation, reduces risk of lower respiratory tract complications, and admittance to hospital, but increases the occurrence of nausea and vomiting.* http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article */PIIS0140-6736%2814%2962449-1/abstract* <http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2962449-1/abstract> -un saludo -juan gérvas 2015-02-02 10:17 GMT+01:00 Juan Gérvas <[log in to unmask]>: > -thanks for your interest, Wouter > -JAMA paper accept without evidence antivirals > -yes, flu vaccine and antivirals go hand by hand in its lack of evidence > -you have excellent evidence at the Cochrane web > http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cochranelibrary/search > -about antivirals, at last FDA has a rational approach, even againts the > CDC > http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-t > he-cdc-and-fda-are-telling-you-two-different-things-about-the-flu/ … > <http://t.co/X8bmz3HMFl> > -un saludo > -juan gérvas > > 2015-02-02 10:07 GMT+01:00 Wouter Havinga <[log in to unmask]>: > >> Dear Juan, >> >> Does the JAMA article say that there is no evidence for antivirals? (due >> to paywall I can not read it). >> >> If that is the case (and in view of the dedicated website by the BMJ >> http://www.bmj.com/tamiflu ) is it acceptable that Eurosurveillance >> publishes an article with in the abstract "Treating influenza with >> antivirals in addition to prevention with vaccination will be important." >> >> http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=21023 >> > >