 |
 |
Hi Jo, The FfW service needs to be promoted and "sold" for what it is which is a 4 - 12 week absence assessment and advisory service - this is it and it can only be initiated if the employee is willing. It is a massively disadvantaged service as assessors will not have any occupational insight into the work environment and will have to fact find their way through the process. The employer referral route is fraught with consent issues that frankly are better dealt with existing providers. The route via GP is dependant upon the GP referring and they have not yet received advice on their role. If there are existing OH provision the FfW service is not supposed to double up work but "work alongside" or leave to the current arrangements. I have been involved with the DWP on the information available for employees, employers and GPs on this - I am not sure when it will be available - hopefully soon! My opinion is that as occupational health providers we should be educating businesses on what the FfW service is (and is not) and the benefits of utilising existing OH services who know the business/ person and occupational setting. Remember we are occupational health FfW service is an advise service on rehabbing individuals who only fall in 4 - 12 week absence! I hope that helps. Regards Janet -----Original Message----- From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Soh vanilla Sent: 20 January 2015 13:24 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] OCC-HEALTH Digest - 16 Jan 2015 to 19 Jan 2015 (#2015-11) Hi Jo As a sole trader I have been concerned about this for some time and am waiting to see what happens once it becomes fully operational. It will in my opinion have a negative impact on work flow for OH whether an inhouse service or not. It's being sold as a freebie that they have to have. Kind regards Carmela Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Jan 2015, at 00:03, OCC-HEALTH automatic digest system <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > There are 8 messages totaling 4137 lines in this issue. > > Topics of the day: > > 1. FW: Fit For Work (3) > 2. Chaperones (5) > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:33:26 +0000 > From: Jo Clayton <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: FW: Fit For Work > > > Dear All, > > The email below has just been sent out from HR to managers... should I be concerned?? > > I'm having a panic attack! > > Best wishes > Jo > > > Hi All > > > > http://fitforwork.org/employer/ > > > Fit for Work is a free and impartial advice service for, employers, GPs and employees. It is designed to support people in work with health conditions and to help with sickness absence. > > > Fit for Work is intended to complement, existing occupational health provision. > > > > I believe that this is in response to the change's to GP fit -notes which haven't necessary been used to their full advantage. It also assists with documentation, advice for health surveillance and pre-employment screening. The is also a free advice line run by specialists. > > > > Kind regards > > > > Emma > > > This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the > intended recipient please inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it. > > Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. > > Thank you for your co-operation. > > [125yr_email_footer] > > > > > E-MAIL DISCLAIMER > > This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the named recipient only and are to be treated as confidential unless the College agrees otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately deleting this e-mail without making copies or using it in any way. The College may be legally obliged to disclose e-mail communications in a response to a legitimate request pursuant to both the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 1998. City College Plymouth reserves the right to monitor, in accordance with its legal obligations, any and all aspects of its e-mail system, including the content of e-mails received, but will not do so routinely. City College Plymouth cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments to it are virus free and does not accept any liability for any damage, costs or loss resulting from any virus infection. Any views expressed in the message are those of the sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the College. > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:45:15 +0000 > From: Irene Douse <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: FW: Fit For Work > > This is very poor practice without discussing with you first. Likely to be for the managers benefit I would be asking. > Irene > > > ________________________________ > From: Jo Clayton <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 10:33 AM > Subject: [OCC-HEALTH] FW: Fit For Work > > > > > > Dear All, > > The email below has just been sent out from HR to managers… should I be concerned?? > > I’m having a panic attack! > > Best wishes > Jo > > > Hi All > > http://fitforwork.org/employer/ > > Fit for Work is a free and impartial advice service for, employers, GPs and employees. It is designed to support people in work with health conditions and to help with sickness absence. > > Fit for Work is intended to complement, existing occupational health provision. > > I believe that this is in response to the change’s to GP fit –notes which haven’t necessary been used to their full advantage. It also assists with documentation, advice for health surveillance and pre-employment screening. The is also a free advice line run by specialists. > > Kind regards > > Emma > > > This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the > intended recipient please inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it. > > Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. > > Thank you for your co-operation. > > > > > E-MAIL DISCLAIMER > > This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the named recipient > only and are to be treated as confidential unless the College agrees otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately deleting this e-mail without making copies or using it in any way. The College may be legally obliged to disclose e-mail communications in a response to a legitimate request pursuant to both the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 1998. City College Plymouth reserves the right to monitor, in accordance with its legal obligations, any and all aspects of its e-mail system, including the content of e-mails received, but will not do so routinely. City College Plymouth cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments to it are virus free and does not accept any liability for any damage, costs or loss resulting from any virus infection. Any views expressed in the message are those of the sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the College. > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:53:47 +0000 > From: Jo Clayton <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: FW: Fit For Work > > Hi Irene, > > I know! I’m quite distressed about it to be honest. > > Jo > > From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Irene Douse > Sent: 19 January 2015 10:45 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] FW: Fit For Work > > This is very poor practice without discussing with you first. Likely to be for the managers benefit I would be asking. > Irene > [http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/40.gif] > From: Jo Clayton > <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 10:33 AM > Subject: [OCC-HEALTH] FW: Fit For Work > > > Dear All, > > The email below has just been sent out from HR to managers… should I be concerned?? > > I’m having a panic attack! > > Best wishes > Jo > > > Hi All > > http://fitforwork.org/employer/ > > Fit for Work is a free and impartial advice service for, employers, GPs and employees. It is designed to support people in work with health conditions and to help with sickness absence. > > Fit for Work is intended to complement, existing occupational health provision. > > I believe that this is in response to the change’s to GP fit –notes which haven’t necessary been used to their full advantage. It also assists with documentation, advice for health surveillance and pre-employment screening. The is also a free advice line run by specialists. > > Kind regards > > Emma > > > This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the > intended recipient please inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it. > > Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. > > Thank you for your co-operation. > > [125yr_email_footer] > > > > E-MAIL DISCLAIMER This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the named recipient only and are to be treated as confidential unless the College agrees otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately deleting this e-mail without making copies or using it in any way. The College may be legally obliged to disclose e-mail communications in a response to a legitimate request pursuant to both the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 1998. City College Plymouth reserves the right to monitor, in accordance with its legal obligations, any and all aspects of its e-mail system, including the content of e-mails received, but will not do so routinely. City College Plymouth cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments to it are virus free and does not accept any liability for any damage, costs or loss resulting from any virus infection. Any views expressed in the message are those of the sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the College. > ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HE > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:41:44 +0000 > From: obianuju ekwueme <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Chaperones > > Dear List, > > I have a client whose spouse follows to see me in the clinic. > The employee tells me how he feels and the spouse tries to refute it. > For instance he feels much better and wants to return back to work as > a teacher. I could see from my previous consultation that he looks > much better having implemented what we discussed. He confirmed to me > that he feels much better and wants to return back to work as soon as > possible. I was about to initiate a return to work program when the > spouse who left her bag in the consulting room to go to toilet, came > out of the toilet, came into the clinic heard what we were > discussing and said 'no' that the GP have just given him another > four weeks sick note. I tried to explain the position of the GP sick > note and myself and she wants to argue. I observe that the same thing > happened the last time I saw this gentle man Should I stop his spouse accompanying him to my clinics? > She tends to want to make decisions for this gentleman who is compos > mentis and not a child. > Where does chaperones stand in occupational health consultation? > Medical defense organisation states that relations should not act as > cheperones So can an occupational health nurse ask a disruptive > relation to leave the consulting room I tried to check the NMC site > for guidance but it referred me *to *GMC good medical practice > explanatory guidance > <http://www.nmc-uk.org/Documents/Consultations/NMC-responses/2012/NMC- > response-GMC-good-medical-practice-consultation-%20June2012.pdf> > which > have not mentioned anything about occupational health.consultation. > I await your contribution. You can answer me off list if it is more > convenient. Thanks > > Virginia. Ekwueme > Email; [log in to unmask] > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:15:32 +0000 > From: Irene Douse <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Chaperones > > Ask her to stay in the waiting area. He may well be happy for you to make that call. If he wants her there tell her that her comments cannot be taken into account. Carry on with your RTW plan and pass this to management. Add that the spouse disagrees and feels that ....... However the person feels that....... it is up to management then. Remind them that the GP fit note is advisory only and subject to Occupational Health Advice. > Irene > > > ________________________________ > From: obianuju ekwueme <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:41 PM > Subject: [OCC-HEALTH] Chaperones > > > > Dear List, > > I have a client whose spouse follows to see me in the clinic. > The employee tells me how he feels and the spouse tries to refute it. > For instance he feels much better and wants to return back to work as > a teacher. I could see from my previous consultation that he looks much better having implemented what we discussed. He confirmed to me that he feels much better and wants to return back to work as soon as possible. I was about to initiate a return to work program when the spouse who left her bag in the consulting room to go to toilet, came out of the toilet, came into the clinic heard what we were discussing and said 'no' that the GP have just given him another four weeks sick note. I tried to explain the position of the GP sick note and myself and she wants to argue. I observe that the same thing happened the last time I saw this gentle man Should I stop his spouse accompanying him to my clinics? > She tends to want to make decisions for this gentleman who is compos mentis and not a child. > Where does chaperones stand in occupational health consultation? > Medical defense organisation states that relations should not act as > cheperones So can an occupational health nurse ask a disruptive > relation to leave the consulting room > > I tried to check the NMC site for guidance but it referred me to GMC good medical practice explanatory guidance which have not mentioned anything about occupational health.consultation. > I await your contribution. You can answer me off list if it is more > convenient. Thanks > > Virginia. Ekwueme > Email; [log in to unmask] > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:40:05 +0000 > From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Chaperones > > Interesting one. I am responding ³on-list² as I am sure several other > OHNs have found or will find themselves in a similar position. > > I would go back to first principles. Mrs X is not exactly acting as a > chaperone, she is acting more as a companion, even though they are married. > I have never had any problems a spouse, union rep or friend > accompanying an employee to a consultation but I clarify the role of > OH and set up ground rules at the start of the consultation ie that > the consultation is between the employee and myself as the OHN. I > confirm to them that I will base my recommendations to management on > what is discussed between myself and the client. I would not get > involved in any lengthy discussions with Mrs X she is not the client. > > My experience is that the success of such a consultation depends on > what the client and their advocate understand about the role of OH and > the friend¹s role as a companion. Poor understanding of the process > often leads to suspicion and concerns that you are intentionally > acting against the interests of the client. Mrs X may misinterpret > your motives assuming that you are going to be a tool of management. I > suspect that Mrs X has not fully understood the role of OH and is not > aware that you are giving an occupational health opinion and making > recommendations to management regarding a return to work recovery > strategy. It is up to the manager whether they wish to accept those > recommendations or not. Of course your recommendations must be based > on sound clinical evidence and reasoning looking through the lens of a > specialist OHN. Perhaps she is unaware that following a sustained > period of absence a phased RTW is more effective than returning to a > full work responsibility and that work is generally good for health. > > As far as asking the relative to leave the room it would depend how > you handled that one. Mrs X may not consider that she is being > disruptive, if she thinks you are acting as a tool of management and > not acting in the best interest of her husband then it is unsurprising > you are having this experience. Once there is mistrust it can be very > difficult to turn the situation round, she may have an entrenched but > eroneous idea of your impartiality, and you indicate this is the > second time you have had this experience. Do you have a more senior > OHN (or OHP) you can discuss this with as part of a process of continuing professional supervision. > > Anne > > >> On 19/01/2015 16:41, "obianuju ekwueme" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> Dear List, >> >> I have a client whose spouse follows to see me in the clinic. >> The employee tells me how he feels and the spouse tries to refute it. >> For instance he feels much better and wants to return back to work as >> a teacher. I could see from my previous consultation that he looks >> much better having implemented what we discussed. He confirmed to me >> that he feels much better and wants to return back to work as soon as >> possible. I was about to initiate a return to work program when the >> spouse who left her bag in the consulting room to go to toilet, came >> out of the toilet, came into the clinic heard what we were >> discussing and said 'no' that the GP have just given him another >> four weeks sick note. I tried to explain the position of the GP sick >> note and myself and she wants to argue. I observe that the same thing >> happened the last time I saw this gentle man Should I stop his spouse accompanying him to my clinics? >> She tends to want to make decisions for this gentleman who is compos >> mentis and not a child. >> Where does chaperones stand in occupational health consultation? >> Medical defense organisation states that relations should not act as >> cheperones So can an occupational health nurse ask a disruptive >> relation to leave the consulting room I tried to check the NMC site >> for guidance but it referred me to GMC good medical practice >> explanatory guidance >> <http://www.nmc-uk.org/Documents/Consultations/NMC-responses/2012/NMC >> -response -GMC-good-medical-practice-consultation-%20June2012.pdf> >> which have not mentioned anything about occupational >> health.consultation. >> I await your contribution. You can answer me off list if it is more >> convenient. Thanks >> >> Virginia. Ekwueme >> Email; [log in to unmask] >> ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. >> >> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html >> >> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: >> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:53:44 +0000 > From: Allison Caine <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Chaperones > > There is no reason for the spouse to accompany her husband. This is an employment situation and not a hospital/GP appointment. > There is no right to have a companion unless the individual has special needs or you think their presence may give added valuable information for you to reach an informed decision. > You need to inform HR that, as this is not a discipline matter he does not require accompanying. Most HR I work with would discuss this with the employee directly and refuse the spouses presence without you having to deal with it, as her behaviour is unacceptable. > > Kind regards, > Allison Caine > Director OHBM Ltd > Direct Phone/Fax: 01625 268609 > Mobile: 07733 125558 > Email: [log in to unmask] > Website: www.ohbm.co.uk > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 19 Jan 2015, at 17:15, Irene Douse <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> Ask her to stay in the waiting area. He may well be happy for you to make that call. If he wants her there tell her that her comments cannot be taken into account. Carry on with your RTW plan and pass this to management. Add that the spouse disagrees and feels that ....... However the person feels that....... it is up to management then. Remind them that the GP fit note is advisory only and subject to Occupational Health Advice. >> Irene >> >> From: obianuju ekwueme <[log in to unmask]> >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:41 PM >> Subject: [OCC-HEALTH] Chaperones >> >> Dear List, >> >> I have a client whose spouse follows to see me in the clinic. >> The employee tells me how he feels and the spouse tries to refute it. >> For instance he feels much better and wants to return back to work as >> a teacher. I could see from my previous consultation that he looks much better having implemented what we discussed. He confirmed to me that he feels much better and wants to return back to work as soon as possible. I was about to initiate a return to work program when the spouse who left her bag in the consulting room to go to toilet, came out of the toilet, came into the clinic heard what we were discussing and said 'no' that the GP have just given him another four weeks sick note. I tried to explain the position of the GP sick note and myself and she wants to argue. I observe that the same thing happened the last time I saw this gentle man Should I stop his spouse accompanying him to my clinics? >> She tends to want to make decisions for this gentleman who is compos mentis and not a child. >> Where does chaperones stand in occupational health consultation? >> Medical defense organisation states that relations should not act as >> cheperones So can an occupational health nurse ask a disruptive >> relation to leave the consulting room I tried to check the NMC site for guidance but it referred me to GMC good medical practice explanatory guidance which have not mentioned anything about occupational health.consultation. >> I await your contribution. You can answer me off list if it is more >> convenient. Thanks >> >> Virginia. Ekwueme >> Email; [log in to unmask] >> ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. >> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html >> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: >> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH >> >> >> ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. >> OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html >> >> CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: >> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:21:58 -0000 > From: Karen Coomer <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Chaperones > > I agree with Alison on this one. In my experience HR normally know about a ‘difficult spouse’ and have in numerous cases I have dealt with have told them to wait in the waiting room. If they do accompany them I have a standard introductory speech which includes me asking them to leave if I feel it is affecting my ability to do an OH assessment, it is said nicely but firmly and I seldom have a problem. > > Karen > > > > > > > > From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Allison Caine > Sent: 19 January 2015 17:54 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [OCC-HEALTH] Chaperones > > > > There is no reason for the spouse to accompany her husband. This is an employment situation and not a hospital/GP appointment. > > There is no right to have a companion unless the individual has special needs or you think their presence may give added valuable information for you to reach an informed decision. > > You need to inform HR that, as this is not a discipline matter he does not require accompanying. Most HR I work with would discuss this with the employee directly and refuse the spouses presence without you having to deal with it, as her behaviour is unacceptable. > > > > Kind regards, > Allison Caine > Director OHBM Ltd > Direct Phone/Fax: 01625 268609 <tel:01625%20268609> > Mobile: 07733 125558 <tel:07733%20125558> > Email: [log in to unmask] > Website: www.ohbm.co.uk <http://www.ohbm.co.uk/> > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 19 Jan 2015, at 17:15, Irene Douse <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Ask her to stay in the waiting area. He may well be happy for you to make that call. If he wants her there tell her that her comments cannot be taken into account. Carry on with your RTW plan and pass this to management. Add that the spouse disagrees and feels that ....... However the person feels that....... it is up to management then. Remind them that the GP fit note is advisory only and subject to Occupational Health Advice. > > Irene > > <http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/40.gif> > > From: obianuju ekwueme <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:41 PM > Subject: [OCC-HEALTH] Chaperones > > > > Dear List, > > > > I have a client whose spouse follows to see me in the clinic. > > The employee tells me how he feels and the spouse tries to refute it. > > For instance he feels much better and wants to return back to work as > a teacher. I could see from my previous consultation that he looks > much better having implemented what we discussed. He confirmed to me > that he feels much better and wants to return back to work as soon as > possible. I was about to initiate a return to work program when the > spouse who left her bag in the consulting room to go to toilet, came > out of the toilet, came into the clinic heard what we were > discussing and said 'no' that the GP have just given him another > four weeks sick note. I tried to explain the position of the GP sick > note and myself and she wants to argue. I observe that the same thing > happened the last time I saw this gentle man > > Should I stop his spouse accompanying him to my clinics? > > She tends to want to make decisions for this gentleman who is compos mentis and not a child. > > Where does chaperones stand in occupational health consultation? > > Medical defense organisation states that relations should not act as > cheperones > > So can an occupational health nurse ask a disruptive relation to leave > the consulting room > > > I tried to check the NMC site for guidance but it referred me to <http://www.nmc-uk.org/Documents/Consultations/NMC-responses/2012/NMC-response-GMC-good-medical-practice-consultation-%20June2012.pdf> GMC good medical practice explanatory guidance which have not mentioned anything about occupational health.consultation. > > I await your contribution. You can answer me off list if it is more > convenient. Thanks > > > > Virginia. Ekwueme > > Email; [log in to unmask] > > ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > > > ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > > ******************************** > Please remove this footer before replying. > > OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html > > CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH > > ------------------------------ > > End of OCC-HEALTH Digest - 16 Jan 2015 to 19 Jan 2015 (#2015-11) > **************************************************************** ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH ******************************** Please remove this footer before replying. OCC-HEALTH ARCHIVES: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html CONFERENCES AND STUDY DAYS: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/filearea.cgi?LMGT1=OCC-HEALTH