Print

Print


At the British Library we adopted a 'train the trainer' approach based
on the RDA training modules available from Library of Congress. We
amended these modules, where necessary, to align with internal policy. 

 

Cataloguer training consisted of the following :

 

Orientation - FRBR/RDA introductory material (2-3 hours)

 

Refresh - Introductory FRBR/ RDA Seminar (2 hours)

                 - Introduction to RDA Toolkit (2 hours)

 

RDA Training: 6 modules over 5 days, split 50/50 between classroom and
hands on practice;

Identifying manifestations and items 

Describing Carriers 

Identifying Works 

Identifying Expressions and describing content 

Relationships 

Authority Control

 

Some cataloguers had additional sessions on specialised material, etc.

 

RDA Review: Working on RDA in a controlled environment with review
(variable, but 1-2 weeks); 

 

Follow up: FRBR for the Terrified / RIMMF: these were intended to
illustrate something of the potential of RDA in the future (outside the
constraints of MARC)  We originally planned to do this before training,
but we decided that cataloguers would get more out of it after they had
an understanding of the application of RDA in MARC.  This involved a
mixture of classroom and hands on activities: (1.5-2 days)

 

Training for paraprofessional staff focussed less of the underlying
structure/principle of RDA and more on job specific tasks. Again, a
combination of classroom and hands on practise was involved. Managers of
paraprofessional teams attended the full cataloguer training.

 

Thurstan

 

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Clifford, Katrina M
Sent: 13 January 2014 15:01
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] CIG Monday Afternoon session: Training

 

It seems a lot of the training is happening in a 'filtered down' way
like this. I wonder if those of you who have done this think it has any
benefits/problems compared with everyone going on the same training?

 

Related to this is the issue of self-paced learning. Those of you who
took this approach, did you find it difficult to fit this round the rest
of your work and, where it's happening in teams how did people check
that everyone understood what they were learning?

 

Katrina

 

Katrina Clifford

Ext: 62118
[log in to unmask]

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kate
Kluttz
Sent: 13 January 2014 14:44
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] CIG Monday Afternoon session: Training

 

On training para-professional staff: after a couple of us at the
professional level attended the "FRBR for the terrified" workshop, I
gave the paraprofs in our department a boiled-down version one morning,
including making them do that activity to place different "things" on
the WEMI scale.  As the Toolkit is so organized around FRBR, I think
they should at least have some introduction to it.  Also, a number of
our paraprofessionals are doing or have recently done their library
qualifications and therefore are interested in learning the more
"advanced" aspects.

 

But I do expect that they'll perform their day to day work referring to
our local documentation and not worrying much about FRBR.

 

 

Kate Kluttz

Acquisitions & Metadata Librarian

University of the Arts London Library Services

020 7514 8586

[log in to unmask]

www.arts.ac.uk/library

  <https://twitter.com/UAL_Libraries>    
<https://www.facebook.com/UALlibraries>    
<http://blogs.arts.ac.uk/libraryservices/>    
<http://arts.ac.libanswers.com/index.php>   

 

 

 

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen
Williams
Sent: 13 January 2014 14:30
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] CIG Monday Afternoon session: Training

 

Can I ask, in terms of training para-professional cataloguing staff are
people planning on teaching FRBR and WEMI.  Like Katrina I've focused on
the actual practicalities of RDA for now with the thought that I will
return to FRBR and WEMI when our catalogues are more structured in that
way.  But I'd be interested to hear what others are doing. 

Helen 

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Clifford, Katrina M
Sent: 13 January 2014 14:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] CIG Monday Afternoon session: Training

 

Thanks for this Jackie. I'm interested to see you've built in time for
discussion sessions as well as just training. Do you anticipate
continuing these once you start cataloguing fully?

 

I'm also interested in the whole WEMI thing. I suspect I've not given
that as much thought as I should have compared to the actual
practicalities of doing RDA. Maybe that's incredibly blinkered of me
though.....

 

Katrina

 

Katrina Clifford

Ext: 62118
[log in to unmask]

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Jackie Johnson (Library Services)
Sent: 13 January 2014 14:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] CIG Monday Afternoon session: Training

 

We have drawn up a training programme to take place over the next few
months, starting with an introductory session for all staff, then more
tailored sessions for cataloguing staff, with the expectation that they
will do some self tutoring probably using the Cambridge materials
(thanks very much for these), plus some discussion sessions. As
mentioned earlier, trying to explain FRBR, and WEMI etc to the
uninitiated, even the initiated, is quite a challenge! 

 

Jackie 

 

 


Jackie Johnson                    
Metadata Team Leader

Library Services
University of Birmingham  
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
[log in to unmask]
0121-414-2767

 

Please note I do not work Mondays

 

Twitter: @uoblibservices <https://twitter.com/UoBLibServices> 

Website: https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/library

 

 

 

 

From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Clifford, Katrina M
Sent: 13 January 2014 13:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] CIG Monday Afternoon session: Training

 

Good afternoon and welcome back to the discussion on adopting RDA where
we're turning our thoughts to training.

 

If you're just catching up with the morning discussion (and thank you to
all those who have already contributed), then feel free to continue to
reply to any messages.

 

As with the morning session, we'll have some prompts to direct the
discussion, but please post anything you think is relevant.  If you're
posting about something new, then please give your subject header a
relevant title so that those participating can keep track of
conversations more easily.

 

A reminder that if you're replying to messages and want them to post to
the list, then hit 'Reply to all' rather than just 'Reply' as that'll go
only to the sender of the message and not the whole list.

 

To start this session, I'd like to start by asking 

 

How did you approach/are you approaching training? - this can be for
those in your team, or as touched upon this morning, for those who don't
catalogue directly but still might be affected.

 

Katrina

 


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer

 

________________________________


This email and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and
may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient of this email and/or its attachments you must not take any
action based upon them and you must not copy or show them to anyone.
Please send the email back to us and immediately and permanently delete
it and its attachments.

Where this email is unrelated to the business of University of the Arts
London or of any of its group companies the opinions expressed in it are
the opinions of the sender and do not necessarily constitute those of
University of the Arts London (or the relevant group company).

Where the sender's signature indicates that the email is sent on behalf
of London Artscom Limited the following also applies: London Artscom
Limited is a company registered in England and Wales under company
number 02361261. Registered Office: University of the Arts London, 272
High Holborn, London WC1V 7EY.

-- 
Scanned by iCritical. 



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.