Hi Anderson,
Many thanks again. I am really interested in tbss_maxc_* result. How do I get tbss_maxc_* results then using randomise?
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Virendra
From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Anderson M. Winkler [[log in to unmask]]Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 8:08 PM
Hi Virendra,These are different things and won't be equal.Anderson
Am Mittwoch, 10. April 2013 schrieb Virendra Mishra :
Thank you for your quick reply. What I really meant to type was without the --T2 option and with -c 3 option whether the results of tbss_tfce_corrp_tstat_* will be equal to tbss_maxc_tstat_* ?
Thanks again for your time.
Sincerely,
Virendra
From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Anderson M. Winkler [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 7:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [FSL] cluster-based thresholding v/s tfce
Hi Virendra,
No no, they are different things and adding extra options will give you additional results, but one result doesn't interfere with another.So, having --T2 and -c 3 in the same randomise call will give produce TFCE and cluster extent results, each on their own right.
All the best,
Anderson
Am Mittwoch, 10. April 2013 schrieb Virendra R Mishra :
Hello FSL users,
I have a quick question on cluster-based thresholding v/s tfce in randomise.
If I use "randomise -i all_FA_skeletonised -o tbss -m mean_FA_skeleton_mask -d design.mat -t design.con -n 500 --T2 -V", I understand that the output is tfce based but if I use "randomise -i all_FA_skeletonised -o tbss -m mean_FA_skeleton_mask -d design.mat -t design.con -n 500 --T2 -V -c 3" then the results are cluster based, right?
What I mean to ask is, whether tbss_tfce_corrp_tstat1 and tbss_tfce_corrp_tstat2 are equivalent to tbss_maxc_tstat1 and tbss_maxc_tstat2 if I use " -c 3" option?
Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
Virendra
UT Southwestern Medical Center
The future of medicine, today.