>

Dear All

>

 

>

The exchange of views has been very positive, with some constructive suggestions about how the name might better reflect the scope and perspective of our Society’s activities. However, it seems to me that there is a strong
> overall consensus in favour of preserving the present name of the Society, on a variety of independent but mutually supporting criteria.

>

 

>

For my own part, many considerations notwithstanding, I am minded to withdraw my own proposal that the name be modified.

>

 

>

Would anyone care to second the suggestion that (even without having concluded a
>bellum in any strict sense of the term) we maintain the
>status quo as regards the Society’s name?

>

 

>

David

>

>

>

PS. Congratulations to Konrad on the success of the SiHoLS series.

>