I used “compiler”, although looking now at the definition of a compiler that doesn’t seem quite right.
I think I was determined to select something from I.2 (associated with work) as it didn’t seem right to use something from I.3 (associated with an expression), as surely we are at the level of “work” here?
--
Paul Amies
Cataloguer
UCL Library Services
University College London
Gower Street
London
WC1E 6BT
Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 2204 (Internal ext: 32204)
From: CIG E-Forum
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen Williams
Sent: 24 October 2012 12:03
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4
Looking at the notes in Debbie’s record has reminded me of a good point to make on this record – in all the records I’ve looked at so far I think we’ve all made the decision to enter all 4 editors, rather than
use the option to abridge.
Also, what do people think about relationship designators here. I was unsure whether to use editor, or editor of compilation.
Helen
From: CIG E-Forum
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Helen Williams
Sent: 24 October 2012 12:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CIG-E-FORUM] Discussion of record 4
Let’s kick off discussion of record 4 before lunchtime.
Did anyone else add a related work for ‘In series: Principles and practice in records management and archives’
I wasn’t quite sure how to format this either.
Helen
Helen Williams
Assistant Librarian, Bibliographic Services
LSE Library Services
The London School of Economics and Political Science
10 Portugal Street
London WC2A 2HD
020 7955 7234
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer:
http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer:
http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer