Print

Print


Thank you to everyone who has submitted a version of record 2.

It’s time to open up discussion on anything you’d like to raise.  It’s going to be very useful to talk about the differences we see in records, and on some issues we may be able to come to consensus, while other areas will remain open to interpretation!  Any comments we make won’t be criticisms of differences in records, so please feel free to discuss. 

 

A few things I’ve noticed to start us off…

 

*some of us have included a second 264 field with a © date

* some of us (including me!) have included a relationship designator of ‘author’ – what’s the feeling about whether this is necessary on a straightforward record? 

* A few people have included related works/manifestations

 

Plenty of other differences too, so let’s open the discussion

 

Helen

Helen Williams

Assistant Librarian, Bibliographic Services

 

LSE Library Services

The London School of Economics and Political Science

10 Portugal Street

London WC2A 2HD

 

[log in to unmask]

020 7955 7234

 


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer