Thank you to everyone who has submitted a version of record 2.
It’s time to open up discussion on anything you’d like to raise. It’s going to be very useful to talk about the differences we see in records, and on some issues we may be able to come to consensus, while other areas will remain open to interpretation! Any comments we make won’t be criticisms of differences in records, so please feel free to discuss.
A few things I’ve noticed to start us off…
*some of us have included a second 264 field with a © date
* some of us (including me!) have included a relationship designator of ‘author’ – what’s the feeling about whether this is necessary on a straightforward record?
* A few people have included related works/manifestations
Plenty of other differences too, so let’s open the discussion
Helen
Helen Williams
Assistant Librarian, Bibliographic Services
LSE Library Services
The London School of Economics and Political Science
10 Portugal Street
London WC2A 2HD
020 7955 7234