Print

Print


Edition statement:

RDA 2.5.2.6 has an example (4th one down) which I used as the rationale behind this one. 
"If edition statement is integral to other title information, record it as such and do not record a further designation of edition".

The 4th example says "a revised and augmented edition of...", so I took that. However, I then can't include 'fully revised and updated' as I'm not allowed to include another edition statement.

BUT I object to treating this as a subtitle!! Feels wrong on so many levels!

HelenD.

Helen Doyle
Assistant Librarian
 
Royal Academy of Dance
36 Battersea Square
London
SW11 3RA
0207 326 8032


>>> Helen Williams <[log in to unmask]> 10/25/2012 11:59 am >>>
Hi Helen

I was very unsure about your first point too. In the end I didn't put it
as a subtitle, because I'd effectively recorded the same information in
the designation of edition, and in note on title...
But I wasn't convinced that was correct. 

Helen 



-----Original Message-----
From: CIG E-Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Helen
Doyle
Sent: 25 October 2012 11:54
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: [CIG-E-FORUM] Record 8

No. 8.

Issues:
1) is that edition statement a subtitle?? (I have lots of notes going
back-and-forth on this!)
2) I went with previous editions being related expressions - ?

HelenD.



Helen Doyle
Assistant Librarian
 
Royal Academy of Dance
36 Battersea Square
London
SW11 3RA
0207 326 8032


>>> Wendy Taylor <[log in to unmask]> 10/25/2012 11:50 am >>>
Wendy (RNIB)


Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer