Print

Print


Hi,

UK edition: I did include it, purely because it's got the word
'edition' in it (RDA 2.5.2.1). However, other examples we've looked at
have said "First published 2012" and I haven't turned that into "1st
edition" purely because it doesn't contain the word 'edition'. Am I
being inconsistent?

HelenD.


Helen Doyle
Assistant Librarian

Royal Academy of Dance
36 Battersea Square
London
SW11 3RA
0207 326 8032


>>> "C.J. Carty" <[log in to unmask]> 10/25/2012 10:04 am >>>
Dear all,

Here is my record for title 6, looking forward to another day of
discussions. I did all of today's titles using the MARC template,
though I
must say I think I found the RDA template easier to use.

Questions in this record for me: 1) The edition statement - did others

consider "UK edition" to be an edition statement? 2) I've obviously
decided
to transcribe all the editors and also provide access points for them
all.
3) Relationship designators - after Alan's helpful email and all of
yesterday's discussions on this, I'd need to see the contents page to
make
a decision here between "editor" and "editor of compilation" but feel
fairly happy that they're not "author". I've left my original choice of

"editor" in the record.


--
CĂ©line Carty
English Cataloguing
Cambridge University Library
Cambridge CB3 9DR