 |
 |
Hi, UK edition: I did include it, purely because it's got the word 'edition' in it (RDA 2.5.2.1). However, other examples we've looked at have said "First published 2012" and I haven't turned that into "1st edition" purely because it doesn't contain the word 'edition'. Am I being inconsistent? HelenD. Helen Doyle Assistant Librarian Royal Academy of Dance 36 Battersea Square London SW11 3RA 0207 326 8032 >>> "C.J. Carty" <[log in to unmask]> 10/25/2012 10:04 am >>> Dear all, Here is my record for title 6, looking forward to another day of discussions. I did all of today's titles using the MARC template, though I must say I think I found the RDA template easier to use. Questions in this record for me: 1) The edition statement - did others consider "UK edition" to be an edition statement? 2) I've obviously decided to transcribe all the editors and also provide access points for them all. 3) Relationship designators - after Alan's helpful email and all of yesterday's discussions on this, I'd need to see the contents page to make a decision here between "editor" and "editor of compilation" but feel fairly happy that they're not "author". I've left my original choice of "editor" in the record. -- Céline Carty English Cataloguing Cambridge University Library Cambridge CB3 9DR