Again, I'm unable to participate fully in the day because of meetings. However, going back to record 6, if I may, was anyone tempted by RDA 2.4.1.5 (Optional Omission), recording the edition statement as 'edited by R. David Lankes (and five others)? Personally, I think I'd want to record all names listed if I was cataloguing this for real but thought I'd tackle this example slightly differently. Perhaps I was feeling pressured for time when I catalogued this one ... My apologies if this has been debated already today - I haven't managed to read all the threads on record 6, and my apologies if I've mis-interpreted this rule completely! Best wishes, Sandra Sandra Cockburn Oxford Brookes University