I am sure the ICO can speak for itself on this matter and I would imagine they will pursue this as it develops. To me, this looks a standard press statement holding response until they can get involved, investigate, and come to some conlusions about what is happenning.

I would be alarmed if they were straight out of the blocks threatening a fine and denouncing the authority.  It would appear the strategy is to grind slowly but grind fine.


With each fine and each undertaking and each notice, the pressure grows on authorities to get their act together.  I would imagine that an economic model would show the fines peaking at some point and then falling back to a steady level as the basic infrastructure to avoid a fine should be in place and more specific breaches, that would move beyond the systems and procedures that are in place, will be what attracts attention.


I can imagine it will follow a trajectory similar to the use of the exemptions in FOI.  Today, I would imagine that the ICO will give short shrift to anyone arguing s.41 applies simply because a document is marked confidential.  The number of decision notices and guidance over the past five years has shown that for the exemption to be used a number of tests need to be met.  Anyone bringing an argument that does not make note of that guidance and the decision notices, today, rather than 5 years ago, is going to face a harder task.


At the same time, I think very few, if any authorities, are going to make that introductory argument, which they may have made in 2005 or 2006.









From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of KPG Professional Services
Sent: 15 June 2011 13:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [data-protection] Possibly hugh data breach


ICO has responded..... ICO statement on loss of laptops at NHS North Central London


Kevin Giles
KPG Professional Services
51 Unity Terrace
Tel: 07413 934228
Web: http://www.kpgprofessionalservices.co.uk

Help protect our environment by only printing this email if absolutely necessary. The information it contains and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may be unlawful for you to use, share or copy the information, if you are not authorised to do so. If you receive this email by mistake, please inform the person who sent it at the above address and then delete the email from your system. Durham County Council takes reasonable precautions to ensure that its emails are virus free. However, we do not accept responsibility for any losses incurred as a result of viruses we might transmit and recommend that you should use your own virus checking procedures.

All archives of messages are stored permanently and are available to the world wide web community at large at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html

Selected commands (the command has been filled in below in the body of the email if you are receiving emails in HTML format):

All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm and are sent in the body of an otherwise blank email to [log in to unmask]

Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner [log in to unmask]

(Please send all commands to [log in to unmask] not the list or the moderators, and all requests for technical help to [log in to unmask], the general office helpline)