Print

Print


Hi Winnie,

We having SL4 glite3.1 lcg-CE without glite-TORQUE_server and using glite3.1 glite-TORQUE_utils which still supported.
So i think there would be a workaround possible unless your setup is different than us.


Cheers
Govind




On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Winnie Lacesso <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
So the notice is out that gLite 3.1 glite-TORQUE_server, which our
production lcg-CE still uses, is unsupported as of yesterday.

The implication is migrate to CREAM-CE. How many UKI lcg-CE are still production?
quite a lot.

Is the pressure on to move ASAP to all-CREAM?
IIRC there was some mention that not all VOs (albeit non-LHC VOs) can use
a CREAM-CE. Who could give authoritative info on that?
And if it's true, so those VOs are just SOL as we all update to CREAM - y?

Schedule seems badly implemented. IIRC we were told to have a CREAM but
retain lcg-CE too.

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5835 (20110131) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com