Mine is actually not a repeated measures design. I'm running a full factorial and I just want to compare activity in one group vs. another. Do the con files need to be in the same order in each cell in this case?


On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:38 PM, MCLAREN, Donald <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
You should use the flexible factorial for repeated measure designs
with factors for subject and condition in your design.

Best Regards, Donald McLaren
D.G. McLaren, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA
Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General
Hospital and Harvard Medical School
Office: (773) 406-2464
This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain
and which is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
named above. If the reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you are in possession of
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail unintentionally, please
immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773) 406-2464 or

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Pilar Archila-Suerte
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear SPM list,
> In setting ANOVAs in SPM, do the subject files need to be in the same order
> under each cell?
> I just ran two trial trial batches, one with the same order of subjects and
> one with a different order. The areas of activity are very similar but the
> order in which the areas show up as more or less intensive did vary.
> Any insight as to how SPM does this? should I stick to the same order of
> subjects for clarity?
> Thanks,
> Pilar A .