 |
 |
yes good point Jon. That's what I was getting at. Advertising an institution supports SAML2. That's where I suspect a lot of personalisation problems may appear. Having just sold Shibboleth to users it wouldn't be good to then tell them it's dead and they need to go through the whole backup/restore cycle again. ------------------------------------ Alistair Young Senior Software Engineer UHI@Sabhal Mòr Ostaig On 25 Jan 2011, at 11:32, Jon Warbrick wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Alistair Young wrote: > >> thanks Peter. I was hoping for some real world experiences of moving to SAML2. There are quite of a lot of custom SPs out there and personalisations built on Shibboleth style attribute release. > > Likewise I was wondering if people had generally enabled the SAML2 endpoints when moving from Shib1.3 to Shib2, or just stuck with the old SAML1 ones? > > Jon. > > -- > Jon Warbrick > Information Systems Development, Computing Service, University of Cambridge