Roger,
You must have missed my paper at the last Zoo on Sidney's chicks and Chicks....although it had some sort of elevated title about signalling, gender, and rhetorical interpretation, which is not nearly so interesting--now I'll know how to title the article version.
Kathryn
Dr. Kathryn DeZur
Associate Professor
Liberal Arts and Sciences Division
Evenden Tower
SUNY Delhi
Delhi, NY 13753
(607) 746-4462
________________________________________
From: Sidney-Spenser Discussion List [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dorothy Stephens [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:16 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: chicklit?
Good heavens, Roger, I had no idea that Sir Philip Sidney was
associated with so many chicks! Quite a feather in his cap, really.
Because the link inadvertently got divided in your
message--something that used to happen in my emails all the time, for some
reason--I've copied it here in its entirety, with the middle space removed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Philip_Sidney_game
Dot
-----Original Message-----
From: Sidney-Spenser Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Roger Kuin
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:36 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: chicklit?
For those of you who might not instinctively have connected Sir Philip
Sidney with chick begging behaviour, here -- with many thanks to John
McDiarmid -- is a link to follow: http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Sir_Philip_Sidney_game
Roger
