 |
 |
Hi Mark, thanks for the prompt reply. But these ACC and occipital clusters are located quite far from each other (image attached).. I looked through the image, and couldn't find any voxel connecting those two regions. Any other possibilities? Yoona Mark Jenkinson wrote: > Hi, > > Are you sure it is not connected? > It only takes one voxel to connect what otherwise > look like separate clusters. Your table shows that > cluster number 3 spans a large range of coordinates, > so I think that what you consider a separate ACC > cluster is really connected as part of this larger cluster. > > If you are really sure that this is not the case then email > us and we will investigate further. > > All the best, > Mark > > > On 19 Aug 2009, at 16:34, SUBSCRIBE FSL Yoona Kang wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> in my fsl report page, I noticed that ACC cluster was not listed, >> although >> it seemed to have substantially strong activation in the images. Then I >> found that ACC was listed in the local maxima list under occipital pole >> cluster (image attached). I cannot really understand why this happened.. >> they are not close to each other nor they are connected. The ACC >> cluster is >> quite big, too. Can you tell me what is going on? >> >> Thank you very much!! >> >> Sincerely, >> Yoona >> <Picture 7.jpg>