Hi John, Thanks for your reply. Does this mean that the fMRI data are only affinely registered between subjects? Regards, Amir John Ashburner wrote: > If you have SPM8b (latest updates), then you should find this much easier, as > there is now an option to spatially normalise (and spatially blur) fMRI to > MNI space (as it incorporates an additional affine mapping between DARTEL > template and MNI template). I haven't had a chance to update the user guide > for DARTEL yet, but it should be reasonably straightforward to use. > > I expect that the t stats should be increased, and look forward to any > feedback on whether this is the case. > > Best regards, > -John > > > On Tuesday 24 March 2009 16:22, Amir Tahmasebi wrote: > >> Dear John and SPMers, >> >> I am trying to use DARTEL for normalization of fMRI data. I have looked at >> "how to use DARTEL for normalizing fMRI con maps?" thread but it is not >> exactly what I was looking for. >> >> I was wondering how should I use the outputs of DARTEL ("u_rc1*.nii" and >> "Template_6.nii") to normalize my fMRI data which is already coregistered >> to the corresponding structural data. >> >> Thank you, >> Amir >> -- ________________________________ Amir M. Tahmasebi Ph.D. Candidate, Medical Image Analysis Lab. School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario CANADA K7L 3N6 ________________________________ Tel: (613) 533-2797 Web: www.cs.queensu.ca/~tahmaseb