 |
 |
Hi, FSL should currently handle radiological and neurological data fine, even if it is mixed - although I'd still probably avoid mixing them if possible. All the best, Mark On 10 Mar 2009, at 13:06, Regina Lapate wrote: > I have a pretty straightforward question that I haven't been able to > find a > definite answer to by searching in the documentation of fsl: how > well does > fslview and flirt currently handle NIFTI images with a LPI > (RAS/neurological) orientation? > > I found that for the fsl version 3.3, images in neurological > orientation > were not recommended (cf. http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fslfaq/#general_lr) > , but > is that still the case? I currently have a preprocessed dataset in the > neurological orientation I would like to run first and second level > analyzes > with using fsl. Before converting everything to radiological > orientation, I > would like to make sure that this step is actually necessary- or still > highly recommended. > > Thank you very much for any input. > > Regina >