 |
 |
Difficult - would it be reasonable to assume that the one who sent it could not 'reasonably' have assumed it would NOT be, and bears blame for the use made of work carelessly sent? Seems harsh, but otherwise it would be easy for the one who sent to avoid responsibility simply by saying that they did not know the use to which it would be put....... Penny Linda Farrall <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Dear All, Does anyone have any thoughts on the following that they would be happy to share, either on or off list............... a student e-mails work to a friend who is struggling with an assignment and does not realise that the friend intends to use parts of the work in their own submission. The students are accused of collusion. Do list members feel that both students are guilty of an assessment offence or just the one who copied? I hope to receive opinions and possibly examples of real cases. Linda Farrall [log in to unmask] Tel:0117 328 2571 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended exclusively for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please return it to the sender and delete all copies - Thank you. --------------------------------- This email has been independently scanned for viruses and any virus software has been removed using McAfee anti-virus software ************************************************************************* You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change your subscription options, or access list archives, visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html *************************************************************************