 |
 |
In my current set of writing, I am making the argument that at best New Media is at best a broad classification, and at worst becoming a museological term for a movement. I'm also linking it to the remnants of the Modernist Avant-Garde. Here's a question - is the idea of defining New Media dying, i.e. is it becoming integrated into the mainstream enough that its distinction might be becoming without signifying power (my idea of the exhaustion of the symbol?) Patrick Lichty Editor-In-Chief Intelligent Agent Magazine http://www.intelligentagent.com 1556 Clough Street, #28 Bowling Green, OH 43402 225 288 5813 [log in to unmask] "It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees." -----Original Message----- From: Curating digital art - www.newmedia.sunderland.ac.uk/crumb/ [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sarah Cook Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 4:25 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: link to an interesting article... ...asking what new media is http://trace.ntu.ac.uk/Opinion/index.cfm?article=121 Sarah Cook, New Media Curator / Research School of Arts, Design, Media and Culture, University of Sunderland CRUMB web resource for new media art curators http://www.crumbweb.org +44 191 515 2046 skype: sarahcook1 IM/ichat: [log in to unmask]