Print

Print


***** THIS EMAIL WAS SENT VIA THE INTERNET *****

Perhaps he has shares in the Sun !*!*!*

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   John Hughes [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   07 January 2004 09:46
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        FW: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] DPA to
blame agai n

        ***** THIS EMAIL WAS RECEIVED FROM THE INTERNET *****

        I share your suspicions about my former ISEB guru Mr Pounder
fabricating
        this story - especially as he stated that it appeared in yesterday's
Sun
        newspaper. I bought a copy on the way home and searched high and low
but
        couldn't see it anywhere.

        John

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Michael Doherty [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent: 06 January 2004 18:13
        To: [log in to unmask]
        Subject: Re: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] DPA to blame
agai n


        Evenin' all (some more senior people might see the joke),

        I noticed a comment earlier today that there had been no
contribution to
        this discussion from any police subscribers. I cannot speak for The
Police;
        only for me. I work for a police force.

        My view (and that of fellow practitioners in the policing arena) is
the
        police cannot decide in advance the likelihood of any evidence being
        excluded if challenged as being unfair because it has been obtained
by
        means not in accordance with the data protection principles. Or
indeed for
        any other reason.

        It is the task of a judge or magistrate to decide if evidence has
been
        obtained so unfairly that it should be excluded by way of Section 78
Police
        and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). Even then this can only be
done at
        the application of a defendant.

        I see no problem with what the shopkeeper did - although the school
might
        have declined to give him the information unless there was certainty
that
        it was necessary for the investigation of the crime. He might have
simply
        wanted to sort a few kneecaps out.

        If the story is correct it seems likely the shopkeeper spoke to a
bod in a
        police call-centre rather than a police investigator.
        Does anyone share my suspicion that Chris Pounder made this one up
just to
        get people talking?
        Regards,

        Michael Doherty
        Kent Police Data Protection Unit
        01622 652066

        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
               All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
              available to the world wide web community at large at
              http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
              If you wish to leave this list please send the command
               leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
                    All user commands can be found at : -
                http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
          (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
               All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
              available to the world wide web community at large at
              http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
              If you wish to leave this list please send the command
               leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
                    All user commands can be found at : -
                http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
          (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


********************************************************************
* This email is privileged, confidential and subject to copyright. *
* Any unauthorised use or disclosure of its content is prohibited. *
* The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily    *
* be the views held by Scottish Borders Council.                   *
********************************************************************

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
      If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
            All user commands can be found at : -
        http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
  (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^